SAT KAUR vs DIRECTOR GENERAL, NSG AND ORS. — 2/2023
Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 14th March 2026.
RCA DJ - REG. CIVIL APPEAL FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLND010008302023
e-Filing Number
19-01-2023
Filing Number
563/2023
Filing Date
19-01-2023
Registration No
2/2023
Registration Date
20-01-2023
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAT KAUR
Adv. RISHABH GULATI
Respondent(s)
DIRECTOR GENERAL, NSG AND ORS.
SHRI DES RAJ SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LR S
SHRI KISHAN CHAND
DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-03-2026 | Order |
| 18-02-2026 | Order |
| 30-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-12-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The appellate court dismissed Sat Kaur's appeal against the trial court's judgment, upholding the dismissal of her suit for permanent and mandatory injunction. The court found that while Sat Kaur claimed settled possession of property J-44 in East Mehram Nagar, her own cross-examination testimony contradicted this, revealing she had been forcibly dispossessed 10-15 years prior and was no longer in actual possession, thus lacking legal standing to seek injunctive relief against unauthorized construction by defendants Desh Raj and Kishan Chand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The appellate court dismissed Sat Kaur's appeal against the trial court's judgment, upholding the dismissal of her suit for permanent and mandatory injunction. The court found that while Sat Kaur claimed settled possession of property J-44 in East Mehram Nagar, her own cross-examination testimony contradicted this, revealing she had been forcibly dispossessed 10-15 years prior and was no longer in actual possession, thus lacking legal standing to seek injunctive relief against unauthorized construction by defendants Desh Raj and Kishan Chand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts