ROHIT KHATTAR vs NARENDER KAPOOR — 3395/2016
Case under Recovery of Money Section CS. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 26th May 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLET010135462016
Filing Number
9635/2016
Filing Date
15-Nov-2016
Registration No
3395/2016
Registration Date
16-Nov-2016
Court
District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD
Judge
776-District Judge
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 19-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ROHIT KHATTAR
Adv. DAVE
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARENDER KAPOOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Copy Of Order
-
26-May-2026
Copy Of Judgment
Case Summary: Rohit Khattar vs. Narender Kapoor (CS 3395/16) Court Decision: Suit Dismissed The Delhi District Court dismissed plaintiff Rohit Khattar's suit for recovery of ₹46,55,000 against defendant Narender Kapoor. The court found that Khattar failed to prove he had advanced a ₹35 lakh loan to Kapoor against a mortgaged property, citing critical gaps including Khattar's inability to recall the payment mode, failure to establish financial capacity (income tax returns showed ~₹2-2.6 lakh annually), inability to remember if interest was paid, non-examination of key witness (Khattar's father), and contradictions regarding possession delivery and loan terms in the mortgage deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
07-May-2026
Copy Of Order
-
07-May-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
24-Apr-2026
Copy Of Order
-
24-Apr-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy Of Order
-
13-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
District Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Copy Of Order
-
19-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
District Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Copy Of Order
-
23-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
District Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Copy Of Order
-
14-Nov-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Copy Of Order
-
14-Oct-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Copy Of Order
-
16-Sep-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
23-Aug-2025
Copy Of Order
-
23-Aug-2025
Final Arguments
District Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
Copy Of Order
-
18-Jul-2025
Final Arguments
District Judge
-
17-May-2025
Copy Of Order
-
17-May-2025
Final Arguments
District Judge
-
26-Mar-2025
Copy Of Order
-
26-Mar-2025
Final Arguments
District Judge
-
04-Mar-2025
Copy Of Order
-
04-Mar-2025
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
District Judge
-
20-Feb-2025
Copy Of Order
-
20-Feb-2025
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
District Judge
-
17-Jan-2025
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
17-Jan-2025
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
District Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
17-Dec-2024
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
District Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
03-Oct-2024
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
16-Aug-2024
Copy Of Order
-
16-Aug-2024
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
29-May-2024
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
29-May-2024
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
10-Apr-2024
Copy Of Order
-
10-Apr-2024
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
14-Mar-2024
Copy Of Order
-
14-Mar-2024
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
29-Feb-2024
Copy Of Order
-
29-Feb-2024
Final Arguments
District Judge
-
02-Feb-2024
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
02-Feb-2024
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
District Judge
-
05-Jan-2024
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
05-Jan-2024
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
District Judge
-
14-Dec-2023
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
14-Dec-2023
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
District Judge
-
02-Nov-2023
Copy Of Order
-
02-Nov-2023
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
District Judge
-
26-Aug-2023
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
25-May-2023
Copy Of Order
-
25-May-2023
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
27-Feb-2023
Copy Of Order
-
27-Feb-2023
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
15-Nov-2022
Copy Of Order
-
15-Nov-2022
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
04-Aug-2022
Copy Of Order
-
04-Aug-2022
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
21-Apr-2022
Copy Of Order
-
21-Apr-2022
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
18-Jan-2022
Copy Of Order
-
18-Jan-2022
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
25-Sep-2021
Copy Of Order
-
25-Sep-2021
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
15-Jul-2021
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
25-Mar-2021
Copy Of Order
-
25-Mar-2021
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
01-Dec-2020
Copy Of Order
-
01-Dec-2020
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
16-Jul-2020
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
12-Mar-2020
Copy Of Order
-
12-Mar-2020
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
07-Dec-2019
Copy Of Order
-
07-Dec-2019
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
28-Nov-2019
Copy Of Order
-
28-Nov-2019
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
28-Aug-2019
Copy Of Order
-
28-Aug-2019
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
10-May-2019
Copy Of Order
-
10-May-2019
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
13-Mar-2019
Copy Of Order
-
13-Mar-2019
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
05-Feb-2019
Copy Of Order
-
05-Feb-2019
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
16-Oct-2018
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
16-Jul-2018
Copy Of Order
-
16-Jul-2018
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
23-Mar-2018
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
14-Dec-2017
Copy Of Order
-
14-Dec-2017
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
24-Aug-2017
Copy Of Order
-
24-Aug-2017
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
08-Jun-2017
Copy Of Order
-
08-Jun-2017
Issues
District Judge
-
17-Feb-2017
Copy Of Order
-
17-Feb-2017
Issues
District Judge
-
17-Dec-2016
Copy Of Order
-
17-Dec-2016
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
16-Nov-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Nov-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 3395/2016
Case Summary: Rohit Khattar vs. Narender Kapoor (CS 3395/16) Court Decision: Suit Dismissed The Delhi District Court dismissed plaintiff Rohit Khattar's suit for recovery of ₹46,55,000 against defendant Narender Kapoor. The court found that Khattar failed to prove he had advanced a ₹35 lakh loan to Kapoor against a mortgaged property, citing critical gaps including Khattar's inability to recall the payment mode, failure to establish financial capacity (income tax returns showed ~₹2-2.6 lakh annually), inability to remember if interest was paid, non-examination of key witness (Khattar's father), and contradictions regarding possession delivery and loan terms in the mortgage deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts