CONFIENT DENTAL EQUIPMENTS LTD vs HSCC INDIA LTD — 3/2020

Case under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 17th July 2026.

Case disposed

ARBTN CASES

CNR: DLET010112792016

Filing Number

8384/2016

Filing Date

23-Sep-2016

Registration No

3/2020

Registration Date

23-Sep-2016

Court

District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD

Judge

419-District Judge

Decision Date

17-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CONFIENT DENTAL EQUIPMENTS LTD

    Adv. YUDHVIR SINGH CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HSCC INDIA LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jul-2026

    Copy Of Order

  3. 17-Jul-2026

    Copy Of Judgment

    The court dismissed Confident Dental Equipments' petition seeking to set aside the 2016 arbitral award that had rejected its Rs. 62.65 lakh claim for unpaid dental chair supplies and imposed Rs. 2.25 lakh costs. The court found no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, holding that petitioner failed to establish bias, misconduct, or patent illegality; re-appreciation of evidence and documentary interpretation were impermissible. The arbitrator's award, based on consideration of pleadings and evidence, was upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  5. 07-Jul-2026

    Copy Of Order

  6. 07-Jul-2026

    Order

    District Judge

  7. 26-May-2026

    Copy Of Order

  8. 26-May-2026

    Order

    District Judge

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Copy Of Order

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    District Judge

  11. 27-Oct-2025

    Copy Of Order

  12. 27-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    District Judge

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Copy Of Order

  14. 12-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    District Judge

  15. 21-Apr-2025

    Copy Of Order

  16. 21-Apr-2025

    Final Arguments

    District Judge

  17. 28-Jan-2025

    Copy Of Order

  18. 28-Jan-2025

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  19. 04-Nov-2024

    Copy Of Order

  20. 04-Nov-2024

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  21. 05-Aug-2024

    Copy Of Order

  22. 05-Aug-2024

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  23. 18-Mar-2024

    Copy Of Order

  24. 18-Mar-2024

    Misc. cases

    District Judge

  25. 12-Dec-2023

    Copy Of Order

  26. 12-Dec-2023

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  27. 02-Aug-2023

    Copy Of Order

  28. 02-Aug-2023

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  29. 02-Feb-2023

    Copy Of Order

  30. 02-Feb-2023

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  31. 14-Oct-2022

    Copy Of Order

  32. 14-Oct-2022

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  33. 02-Jul-2022

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  34. 23-Apr-2022

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  35. 23-Apr-2022

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  36. 11-Feb-2022

    Copy Of Order

  37. 11-Feb-2022

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  38. 09-Oct-2021

    Copy Of Order

  39. 09-Oct-2021

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  40. 20-Aug-2021

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  41. 16-Jul-2021

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  42. 26-Nov-2020

    Copy Of Order

  43. 26-Nov-2020

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  44. 18-Aug-2020

    Copy Of Order

  45. 18-Aug-2020

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  46. 27-Jun-2020

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  47. 27-May-2020

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  48. 27-Apr-2020

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  49. 27-Mar-2020

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  50. 10-Feb-2020

    Copy Of Order

  51. 10-Feb-2020

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge (Commercial Court)

  52. 21-Oct-2019

    Copy Of Order

  53. 21-Oct-2019

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  54. 29-May-2019

    Copy Of Order

  55. 29-May-2019

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  56. 18-Feb-2019

    Copy Of Order

  57. 18-Feb-2019

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  58. 15-Oct-2018

    Copy Of Order

  59. 15-Oct-2018

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  60. 06-Jun-2018

    Copy Of Order

  61. 06-Jun-2018

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  62. 19-Apr-2018

    Copy Of Order

  63. 19-Apr-2018

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  64. 27-Jan-2018

    Copy Of Order

  65. 27-Jan-2018

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  66. 25-Sep-2017

    Copy Of Order

  67. 25-Sep-2017

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  68. 25-May-2017

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge

  69. 18-May-2017

    Copy Of Order

  70. 18-May-2017

    Misc./ Appearance

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

  71. 05-May-2017

    Copy Of Order

  72. 05-May-2017

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

  73. 23-Mar-2017

    Copy Of Order

  74. 23-Mar-2017

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

  75. 02-Feb-2017

    Copy Of Order

  76. 02-Feb-2017

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

  77. 19-Dec-2016

    Copy Of Order

  78. 19-Dec-2016

    Misc. Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

  79. 11-Nov-2016

    Copy Of Order

  80. 11-Nov-2016

    Misc. cases

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

  81. 27-Sep-2016

    Copy Of Order

  82. 27-Sep-2016

    Misc. cases

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

  83. 23-Sep-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  84. 23-Sep-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Confident Dental Equipments' petition seeking to set aside the 2016 arbitral award that had rejected its Rs. 62.65 lakh claim for unpaid dental chair supplies and imposed Rs. 2.25 lakh costs. The court found no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, holding that petitioner failed to establish bias, misconduct, or patent illegality; re-appreciation of evidence and documentary interpretation were impermissible. The arbitrator's award, based on consideration of pleadings and evidence, was upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case