Umesh Dutt Sharma vs Rajeev Sharma — 671/2025

Case under Declaration and Mandatory Injuction Section 75. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLET010058832025

e-Filing Number

10-11-2025

Filing Number

3126/2025

Filing Date

11-Nov-2025

Registration No

671/2025

Registration Date

12-Nov-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD

Judge

49-District Judge

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Declaration and Mandatory Injuction Section 75

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Umesh Dutt Sharma

    Adv. VINAY SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajeev Sharma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The court disposed of case CS-671/2025 by approving a compromise settlement reached between the parties outside court. The plaintiff's suit and the defendants' counter-claim were settled through a compromise deed, with the court recording the parties' statements and directing a compromised decree be drawn accordingly. Court fees were ordered to be returned as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  7. 20-Dec-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Issues

    District Judge

  9. 14-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 671/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of case CS-671/2025 by approving a compromise settlement reached between the parties outside court. The plaintiff's suit and the defendants' counter-claim were settled through a compromise deed, with the court recording the parties' statements and directing a compromised decree be drawn accordingly. Court fees were ordered to be returned as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case