SWATI CHATTERJEE vs BHUPENDER SINGH — 210/2025

Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section 168. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 29th April 2026.

EX - EXECUTION

CNR: DLET010057982025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-11-2025

Filing Number

3080/2025

Filing Date

06-11-2025

Registration No

210/2025

Registration Date

07-11-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD

Judge

4-Presiding Off.-MACT

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section 168

Petitioner(s)

SWATI CHATTERJEE

Adv. TRIPURARI TIWARI

Respondent(s)

BHUPENDER SINGH

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Presiding Off.-MACT

29-04-2026

Disposed

28-04-2026

Misc. cases

13-03-2026

Misc. cases

03-02-2026

Misc. cases

06-12-2025

Misc. cases

Final Orders / Judgements

29-04-2026
COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Case Summary: Swati Chatterjee v. Bhupender Singh (210/2025) The tribunal approved disbursement of an insurance award of Rs. 1,44,10,506/- to petitioner Swati Chatterjee following High Court directions. The tribunal apportioned 70% of the total award (as per High Court order dated 18.08.2025): Rs. 28 lakhs released immediately, Rs. 34 lakhs for artificial limb costs secured as separate FDR, and remaining Rs. 29.36 lakhs placed in staggered FDRs (1-10 years) in petitioner's name at UCO Bank. The remaining 30% was secured in an auto-renewal FDR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Swati Chatterjee v. Bhupender Singh (210/2025) The tribunal approved disbursement of an insurance award of Rs. 1,44,10,506/- to petitioner Swati Chatterjee following High Court directions. The tribunal apportioned 70% of the total award (as per High Court order dated 18.08.2025): Rs. 28 lakhs released immediately, Rs. 34 lakhs for artificial limb costs secured as separate FDR, and remaining Rs. 29.36 lakhs placed in staggered FDRs (1-10 years) in petitioner's name at UCO Bank. The remaining 30% was secured in an auto-renewal FDR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case