LAXMI vs PURSHOTTAM — 432/2024
Case under Possession and Recovery of Rent/damages/mesne Profit Section 80. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 17th July 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLET010044182024
e-Filing Number
07-08-2024
Filing Number
1843/2024
Filing Date
08-Aug-2024
Registration No
432/2024
Registration Date
08-Aug-2024
Court
District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD
Judge
482-District Judge
Decision Date
17-Jul-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISED
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAXMI
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.PURSHOTTAM
-
2.BIMLA
-
3.SH. HARI SINGH
-
4.MS. JYOTI
-
5.BHARTI
-
6.NEHA
-
7.PRIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jul-2026
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
Case 432/2024 Summary: The suit filed by Laxmi against Purshottam, Bimla, and Hari Singh was disposed of as compromised after the parties amicably settled the matter out of court on 17.07.2026. The court recorded separate statements from the plaintiff and defendants No.1 and 2 confirming the settlement, ordered refund of court fees to the plaintiff under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, and issued no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jul-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
26-May-2026
Copy Of Order
-
26-May-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
15-May-2026
Copy Of Order
-
15-May-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
Misc. cases
-
17-Mar-2025
Copy Of Order
-
17-Mar-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Copy Of Order
-
03-Oct-2024
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Copy Of Order
-
09-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 432/2024
Case 432/2024 Summary: The suit filed by Laxmi against Purshottam, Bimla, and Hari Singh was disposed of as compromised after the parties amicably settled the matter out of court on 17.07.2026. The court recorded separate statements from the plaintiff and defendants No.1 and 2 confirming the settlement, ordered refund of court fees to the plaintiff under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, and issued no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts