SAVITA vs RITIK PAL — 403/2024

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166. Status: Final Arguments. Next hearing: 25th September 2026.

Final Arguments Next hearing 25-Sep-2026

MACT - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLET010043202024

e-Filing Number

03-08-2024

Filing Number

1813/2024

Filing Date

03-Aug-2024

Registration No

403/2024

Registration Date

03-Aug-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD

Judge

4-Presiding Off.-MACT

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAVITA

    Adv. Ankit Mehta

  2. 2.SAURAJ BASU

    Adv. Ankit Mehta

  3. 3.RAHUL BASU

    Adv. Ankit Mehta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RITIK PAL

Case History

  1. 25-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  4. 21-Nov-2025

    Misc. cases

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  5. 10-Oct-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    Summary of MACT 403/2024 In this Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal case, the court adjourned proceedings to 21.11.2025 for R2's appearance (physically or via video conference) and framing of issues. Written statements were filed by R1, R2, and the insurer (R3); however, postal service to R1 remained unserved. The petitioner was absent on 10.10.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 10-Oct-2025

    Misc. cases

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  7. 06-May-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 06-May-2025

    Misc. cases

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  9. 13-Jan-2025

    Misc. cases

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  10. 09-Aug-2024

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  11. 09-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 03-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 403/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MACT 403/2024 In this Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal case, the court adjourned proceedings to 21.11.2025 for R2's appearance (physically or via video conference) and framing of issues. Written statements were filed by R1, R2, and the insurer (R3); however, postal service to R1 remained unserved. The petitioner was absent on 10.10.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case