PRADEEP JAIN vs KUNAL AJAY SINGH AND ORS. — 96/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th April 2026.
CA - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: DLET010035302024
e-Filing Number
26-06-2024
Filing Number
1811/2024
Filing Date
27-Jun-2024
Registration No
96/2024
Registration Date
01-Jul-2024
Court
District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
Decision Date
25-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Krishna Nagar
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRADEEP JAIN
Adv. Mohit Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.KUNAL AJAY SINGH AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Apr-2026
Copy Of Order
-
25-Apr-2026
Copy Of Order
Case Summary: Pradeep Jain vs. Kunal Ajay Singh (96/2024) The Principal District & Sessions Judge upheld the trial court's conviction of Kunal Ajay Singh under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring seven cheques totaling ₹5,75,580 issued during a goods sale transaction. The court rejected the accused's defenses that cheques were forged/blank, payment was stopped due to insufficient funds, and cheques were stolen. It held statutory presumptions of liability under Section 139 were not rebutted, modified concurrent default sentences for non-payment of fine, and ordered the accused to surrender and deposit compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
13-Apr-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy Of Order
-
18-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
25-Feb-2026
Copy Of Order
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
11-Feb-2026
Copy Of Order
-
11-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
06-Jan-2026
Copy Of Order
-
06-Jan-2026
Arguments
-
08-Dec-2025
Copy Of Order
-
08-Dec-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
25-Sep-2025
Copy Of Order
-
25-Sep-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
05-Jul-2025
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
05-Jul-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
24-Apr-2025
Copy Of Order
-
24-Apr-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
19-Apr-2025
Copy Of Order
-
19-Apr-2025
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
02-Apr-2025
Copy Of Order
-
02-Apr-2025
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
28-Jan-2025
Copy Of Order
-
28-Jan-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
18-Dec-2024
Copy Of Order
-
18-Dec-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
26-Nov-2024
Copy Of Order
-
26-Nov-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
23-Oct-2024
Copy Of Order
-
23-Oct-2024
Copy Of Order
-
23-Oct-2024
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
21-Sep-2024
Copy Of Order
-
21-Sep-2024
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
13-Aug-2024
Copy Of Order
-
13-Aug-2024
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
05-Aug-2024
Copy Of Order
-
05-Aug-2024
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
03-Jul-2024
Copy Of Order
-
03-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 96/2024
Case Summary: Pradeep Jain vs. Kunal Ajay Singh (96/2024) The Principal District & Sessions Judge upheld the trial court's conviction of Kunal Ajay Singh under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring seven cheques totaling ₹5,75,580 issued during a goods sale transaction. The court rejected the accused's defenses that cheques were forged/blank, payment was stopped due to insufficient funds, and cheques were stolen. It held statutory presumptions of liability under Section 139 were not rebutted, modified concurrent default sentences for non-payment of fine, and ordered the accused to surrender and deposit compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts