PRADEEP JAIN vs KUNAL AJAY SINGH AND ORS. — 97/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th April 2026.
CA - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: DLET010035282024
e-Filing Number
26-06-2024
Filing Number
1809/2024
Filing Date
27-Jun-2024
Registration No
97/2024
Registration Date
01-Jul-2024
Court
District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
Decision Date
25-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Krishna Nagar
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRADEEP JAIN
Adv. Mohit Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.KUNAL AJAY SINGH AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Apr-2026
Copy Of Order
-
25-Apr-2026
Copy Of Judgment
Summary of Case 97/2024 (Pradeep Jain vs. Kunal Ajay Singh) The appellate court dismissed all three appeals against the trial court's conviction, upholding charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonored cheques totaling Rs. 5,75,580. The court rejected the accused's defenses that cheques were stolen/misused and that blank signed cheques don't constitute liability, holding that Section 139 presumptions apply and the accused failed to rebut them with evidence. The court modified sentencing: three-month imprisonment sentences remain concurrent; however, default imprisonment for non-payment of fines shall run separately, not concurrently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
13-Apr-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy Of Order
-
18-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
25-Feb-2026
Copy Of Order
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
11-Feb-2026
Copy Of Order
-
11-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
06-Jan-2026
Copy Of Order
-
06-Jan-2026
Arguments
-
08-Dec-2025
Copy Of Order
-
08-Dec-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
25-Sep-2025
Copy Of Order
-
25-Sep-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
05-Jul-2025
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
05-Jul-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
24-Apr-2025
Copy Of Order
-
24-Apr-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
19-Apr-2025
Copy Of Order
-
19-Apr-2025
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
02-Apr-2025
Copy Of Order
-
02-Apr-2025
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
28-Jan-2025
Copy Of Order
-
28-Jan-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
18-Dec-2024
Copy Of Order
-
18-Dec-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
26-Nov-2024
Copy Of Order
-
26-Nov-2024
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
23-Oct-2024
Copy Of Order
-
23-Oct-2024
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
21-Sep-2024
Copy Of Order
-
21-Sep-2024
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
13-Aug-2024
Copy Of Order
-
13-Aug-2024
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
05-Aug-2024
Copy Of Order
-
05-Aug-2024
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
-
03-Jul-2024
Copy Of Order
-
03-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 97/2024
Summary of Case 97/2024 (Pradeep Jain vs. Kunal Ajay Singh) The appellate court dismissed all three appeals against the trial court's conviction, upholding charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonored cheques totaling Rs. 5,75,580. The court rejected the accused's defenses that cheques were stolen/misused and that blank signed cheques don't constitute liability, holding that Section 139 presumptions apply and the accused failed to rebut them with evidence. The court modified sentencing: three-month imprisonment sentences remain concurrent; however, default imprisonment for non-payment of fines shall run separately, not concurrently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts