MOHD. USMAN AND ORS. vs SMT. SEEMA PARVEEN — 19/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

T. P. Crl. - Transfer Petition Criminal

CNR: DLET010013692026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

684/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. USMAN AND ORS.

    Adv. Anurag Saxena

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SEEMA PARVEEN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Mohd. Usman vs. Seema Parveen (19/2026) The court dismissed the husband's transfer application alleging bias and misconduct by the trial court judge. The court found the judge's strict enforcement measures—including arrest warrants, costs, and rejection of exemption applications—were justified responses to the husband's non-payment of ₹6,70,000 in maintenance arrears and violation of court orders, not evidence of bias. The court rejected the husband's attempt to challenge judicial orders through transfer application instead of proper appeal procedures and held that his delayed complaint about offensive language lacked credibility. The trial court was directed to proceed expeditiously with the main case and execution petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mohd. Usman vs. Seema Parveen (19/2026) The court dismissed the husband's transfer application alleging bias and misconduct by the trial court judge. The court found the judge's strict enforcement measures—including arrest warrants, costs, and rejection of exemption applications—were justified responses to the husband's non-payment of ₹6,70,000 in maintenance arrears and violation of court orders, not evidence of bias. The court rejected the husband's attempt to challenge judicial orders through transfer application instead of proper appeal procedures and held that his delayed complaint about offensive language lacked credibility. The trial court was directed to proceed expeditiously with the main case and execution petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case