MOHD. USMAN AND ORS. vs SMT. SEEMA PARVEEN — 19/2026

Case Summary: Mohd. Usman vs. Seema Parveen (19/2026) The court dismissed the husband's transfer application alleging bias and misconduct by the trial court judge. The court found the judge's strict enforcement measures—including arrest warrants, costs, and rejection of exemption applications—were justified responses to the husband's non-payment of ₹6,70,000 in maintenance arrears and violation of court orders, not evidence of bias. The court rejected the husband's attempt to challenge judicial orders through transfer application instead of proper appeal procedures and held that his delayed complaint about offensive language lacked credibility. The trial court was directed to proceed expeditiously with the main case and execution petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.