Jamna vs Bhupendra — 52/2025

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 22nd March 2026.

Case disposed

MACT - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLET010007312025

e-Filing Number

10-02-2025

Filing Number

382/2025

Filing Date

10-Feb-2025

Registration No

52/2025

Registration Date

11-Feb-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD

Judge

4-Presiding Off.-MACT

Decision Date

22-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jamna

    Adv. Indu Aggarwal

  2. 2.Shiva

    Adv. Indu Aggarwal

  3. 3.Suman

    Adv. Indu Aggarwal

  4. 4.Gunjan

    Adv. Indu Aggarwal

  5. 5.Sagar

    Adv. Indu Aggarwal

  6. 6.Akash

    Adv. Indu Aggarwal

  7. 7.Maya devi

    Adv. Indu Aggarwal

  8. 8.Dharampal

    Adv. Indu Aggarwal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhupendra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  3. 15-Dec-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    In MACT Case 52/2025, the Delhi court adjourned proceedings to 24.04.2026 for compliance after the petitioners (Jamna, Shiva, and Suman) sought additional time to file a certified copy of the criminal case record, citing that the charge-sheet has not yet been filed. Summons to respondent Bhupendra remained unserved, while the insurer's written statement was already on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Dec-2025

    Misc. cases

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  5. 19-Aug-2025

    Misc. cases

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  6. 22-Feb-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  7. 22-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In MACT Case 52/2025, the Delhi court adjourned proceedings to 24.04.2026 for compliance after the petitioners (Jamna, Shiva, and Suman) sought additional time to file a certified copy of the criminal case record, citing that the charge-sheet has not yet been filed. Summons to respondent Bhupendra remained unserved, while the insurer's written statement was already on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case