Jasoda Devi(Legal Heir) vs Mukesh Kumar — 36/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,106(1). Status: Issues. Next hearing: 17th September 2026.
MACT - M.A.C.T.
CNR: DLET010004532025
e-Filing Number
23-01-2025
Filing Number
213/2025
Filing Date
24-Jan-2025
Registration No
36/2025
Registration Date
24-Jan-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD
Judge
4-Presiding Off.-MACT
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jasoda Devi(Legal Heir)
Adv. VIRENDER KUMAR
-
2.Ankesh
Adv. VIRENDER KUMAR
-
3.Sonam
Adv. VIRENDER KUMAR
-
4.Lalaram
Adv. VIRENDER KUMAR
-
5.Leelawati
Adv. VIRENDER KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mukesh Kumar
Case History
-
17-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
Issues
Presiding Off.-MACT
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
In MACT Case 36/25 (Jasoda Devi vs. Mukesh Kumar), heard on 16.03.2026, the court adjourned the matter for filing of written statements by R1 and R3 and framing of issues on 02.06.2026. R2's written statement was accepted on record, with petitioner's written statement also retained. No representation appeared for the petitioners at the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Issues
Presiding Off.-MACT
-
01-Nov-2025
Misc. cases
Presiding Off.-MACT
-
13-Sep-2025
Misc. cases
Presiding Off.-MACT
-
26-Aug-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
26-Aug-2025
Misc. cases
Presiding Off.-MACT
-
22-Mar-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
22-Mar-2025
Misc. cases
Presiding Off.-MACT
-
25-Feb-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
25-Feb-2025
Misc. cases
Presiding Off.-MACT
-
01-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2025
In MACT Case 36/25 (Jasoda Devi vs. Mukesh Kumar), heard on 16.03.2026, the court adjourned the matter for filing of written statements by R1 and R3 and framing of issues on 02.06.2026. R2's written statement was accepted on record, with petitioner's written statement also retained. No representation appeared for the petitioners at the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts