ANUPAMA AND ORS vs BHUPENDER DEEP SINGH AND ORS — 77/2026

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

MISC DJ - MISC. CASES FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLET010004402026

e-Filing Number

20-01-2026

Filing Number

245/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

77/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD

Judge

4-Presiding Off.-MACT

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANUPAMA AND ORS

    Adv. TEJVEER SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHUPENDER DEEP SINGH AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

    Case 77/2026 Summary: The court granted Anupama's application for premature release of fixed deposits, directing UCO Bank to release Rs. 4,50,000 (with accrued interest) from her Rs. 6,00,000 FDR. The court considered her financial need to establish a beauty parlor for self-support and medical care of her 2-year-old daughter suffering from a congenital heart defect, and found the request reasonable despite partial denial of the full amount requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Misc. cases

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Misc. cases

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 77/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 77/2026 Summary: The court granted Anupama's application for premature release of fixed deposits, directing UCO Bank to release Rs. 4,50,000 (with accrued interest) from her Rs. 6,00,000 FDR. The court considered her financial need to establish a beauty parlor for self-support and medical care of her 2-year-old daughter suffering from a congenital heart defect, and found the request reasonable despite partial denial of the full amount requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case