VIMAL JAIN vs BHAWANI SINGH — 3/2026

Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

T. P. Civil - Transfer Petition Civil

CNR: DLET010002862026

e-Filing Number

13-01-2026

Filing Number

162/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

14-Jan-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIMAL JAIN

    Adv. SAURABH SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAWANI SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The court transferred appeal RCA DJ/67/2025 (Bhawani Singh vs. Vimal Jain) from District Judge-02 to District Judge-06 at Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, to consolidate it with the connected appeal RCA/DJ/68/2025 already pending there. The transfer was granted based on the applicant's request and the respondent's consent, as a prior civil judge had already determined both cases were connected, and consolidation would prevent conflicting decisions and benefit both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

  6. 15-Jan-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  7. 15-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court transferred appeal RCA DJ/67/2025 (Bhawani Singh vs. Vimal Jain) from District Judge-02 to District Judge-06 at Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, to consolidate it with the connected appeal RCA/DJ/68/2025 already pending there. The transfer was granted based on the applicant's request and the respondent's consent, as a prior civil judge had already determined both cases were connected, and consolidation would prevent conflicting decisions and benefit both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case