COMP-RENU SHARMA vs MOHAMMAD ALI — 41/2026

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

MISC DJ - MISC. CASES FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLET010002112026

Filing Number

106/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

14-Jan-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD

Judge

4-Presiding Off.-MACT

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.COMP-RENU SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD ALI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

    Case Summary: COMP-RENU SHARMA vs. MOHAMMAD ALI (41/2026) The court apportioned an insurance compensation award of Rs. 23,00,000 among the deceased's family members: Rs. 12,00,000 to the wife (petitioner 1), with Rs. 6,00,000 released immediately and Rs. 6,00,000 invested in staggered FDRs over 6 years; Rs. 4,00,000 each to two minor children in FDRs until majority; and Rs. 3,00,000 to the elderly father. The court prioritized the wife's immediate liquidity needs for household expenses and protected minors' funds through fixed deposit instruments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COMP-RENU SHARMA vs. MOHAMMAD ALI (41/2026) The court apportioned an insurance compensation award of Rs. 23,00,000 among the deceased's family members: Rs. 12,00,000 to the wife (petitioner 1), with Rs. 6,00,000 released immediately and Rs. 6,00,000 invested in staggered FDRs over 6 years; Rs. 4,00,000 each to two minor children in FDRs until majority; and Rs. 3,00,000 to the elderly father. The court prioritized the wife's immediate liquidity needs for household expenses and protected minors' funds through fixed deposit instruments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case