SURAJ SHRIVASTAVA vs CBI — 64/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

BAIL MATTERS

CNR: DLCT110002672026

Filing Number

267/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

64/2026

Registration Date

14-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge cum Special Judge PC Act CBI, Rouse Avenue

Judge

5-Special Judge (Pc Act) (Cbi)

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURAJ SHRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CBI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CBI v. Suraj Shrivastava (Bail Matter 64/2026) The Special Judge granted regular bail to Suraj Shrivastava, accused in a transnational cyber-fraud involving fake Kuwait e-visas and job offers targeting 431 Indian victims. The court found that while allegations are serious, Shrivastava—who was not named in the original FIR—stands on equal footing with primary accused Rahul Gupta and Rajitha K.V (both unarrested), warranting bail with strict conditions including non-contact with victims, no international travel, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge (Pc Act) (Cbi)

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CBI v. Suraj Shrivastava (Bail Matter 64/2026) The Special Judge granted regular bail to Suraj Shrivastava, accused in a transnational cyber-fraud involving fake Kuwait e-visas and job offers targeting 431 Indian victims. The court found that while allegations are serious, Shrivastava—who was not named in the original FIR—stands on equal footing with primary accused Rahul Gupta and Rajitha K.V (both unarrested), warranting bail with strict conditions including non-contact with victims, no international travel, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case