BALBIR CHAND TIWARI vs CBI — 104/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.
MISC DJ ASJ - MISC. CASES FOR DJ ASJ
CNR: DLCT110002142026
Filing Number
214/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
104/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge cum Special Judge PC Act CBI, Rouse Avenue
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI)
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BALBIR CHAND TIWARI
Respondent(s)
CBI
SUMEDH SINGH SAINI
SUKH MOHINDER SINGH SANDHU
PARAMJIT SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI)
Disposed
Misc. cases
Misc. cases
Misc. cases
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Misc. cases |
| 09-03-2026 | Misc. cases |
| 06-03-2026 | Misc. cases |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Balbir Chand Tiwari vs. CBI & Others (104/2026) The court dismissed transfer petitions filed by accused Balbir Chand Tiwari and Sukh Mohinder Singh Sandhu in a 32-year-old kidnapping case arising from a 1994 incident. The petitioners claimed bias by the trial judge, alleging he: (1) changed the hearing procedure for final arguments, (2) dismissed their compliance application without proper hearing, and (3) recognized the complainant, suggesting prior acquaintance. The court found these grounds lacking merit—the ordersheet change was a clerical error already clarified, the application dismissal was procedurally valid, and the judge's reference to the complainant was routine given his presence in court. Given the case's long pendency and prior transfers, further shifting would cause unnecessary delay contrary to justice interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Balbir Chand Tiwari vs. CBI & Others (104/2026) The court dismissed transfer petitions filed by accused Balbir Chand Tiwari and Sukh Mohinder Singh Sandhu in a 32-year-old kidnapping case arising from a 1994 incident. The petitioners claimed bias by the trial judge, alleging he: (1) changed the hearing procedure for final arguments, (2) dismissed their compliance application without proper hearing, and (3) recognized the complainant, suggesting prior acquaintance. The court found these grounds lacking merit—the ordersheet change was a clerical error already clarified, the application dismissal was procedurally valid, and the judge's reference to the complainant was routine given his presence in court. Given the case's long pendency and prior transfers, further shifting would cause unnecessary delay contrary to justice interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District and Sessions Judge cum Special Judge PC Act CBI, Rouse Avenue All courts →Explore other courts