BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED vs KUSUM AND ANR — 1590/2025

Case under Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

Ct. Cases - COMPLAINT CASES

CNR: DLCT010189062025

e-Filing Number

05-12-2025

Filing Number

7365/2025

Filing Date

06-Dec-2025

Registration No

1590/2025

Registration Date

13-Dec-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Central, THC

Judge

32-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISE

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Khyala

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KUSUM AND ANR

  2. 2.SARITA BHATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    Case Summary: BSES Rajdhani Power Limited vs. Kusum and Anr (1590/2025) The complaint case was disposed of as settled after the accused persons paid the full civil liability under the PCC (Power Consumer Compensation) scheme regarding the disputed electricity bill. The court directed that the accused be provided with a new electricity connection upon completion of commercial formalities, and cancelled any bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge

  8. 13-Dec-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  9. 13-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 06-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1590/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BSES Rajdhani Power Limited vs. Kusum and Anr (1590/2025) The complaint case was disposed of as settled after the accused persons paid the full civil liability under the PCC (Power Consumer Compensation) scheme regarding the disputed electricity bill. The court directed that the accused be provided with a new electricity connection upon completion of commercial formalities, and cancelled any bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case