SUMAN LATA SINGH vs MANOJ KUMAR RAMEHS CHANDRE AGGARWAL — 1248/2022

Case under Recovery of Money Section 74. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

CS DJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ

CNR: DLCT010165232022

Filing Number

9615/2022

Filing Date

01-Dec-2022

Registration No

1248/2022

Registration Date

02-Dec-2022

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Central, THC

Judge

9-District Judge

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Recovery of Money Section 74

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMAN LATA SINGH

    Adv. MAHESH KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR RAMEHS CHANDRE AGGARWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  3. 30-May-2026

    Copy Of JudgmentView PDF

    The Delhi District Court dismissed Suman Lata Singh's defamation suit against Manoj Kumar Ramesh Chandre Aggarwal, finding that the plaintiff failed to prove publication of defamatory statements or quantifiable losses. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: no witnesses to alleged defamatory messages, unproven digital screenshots lacking Section 65B certificates, no income documentation, and hearsay testimony from the plaintiff herself about WhatsApp group messages she wasn't part of. Additionally, the plaintiff imposed costs of Rs 3,000 on the plaintiff for filing vexatious litigation following the defendant's prior recovery suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  6. 28-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    District Judge

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  11. 26-Nov-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  12. 26-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  13. 18-Sep-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  14. 18-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  15. 03-Jul-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  16. 03-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  17. 25-Feb-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  18. 25-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  19. 16-Dec-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  20. 16-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  21. 29-Aug-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  22. 29-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  23. 14-May-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  24. 14-May-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  25. 30-Jan-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  26. 30-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  27. 28-Nov-2023

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  28. 28-Nov-2023

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  29. 01-Sep-2023

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  30. 01-Sep-2023

    Issues

    District Judge

  31. 08-May-2023

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  32. 08-May-2023

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Additional District Judge(ADJ)

  33. 12-Jan-2023

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  34. 12-Jan-2023

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Additional District Judge(ADJ)

  35. 02-Dec-2022

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  36. 02-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 01-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1248/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Delhi District Court dismissed Suman Lata Singh's defamation suit against Manoj Kumar Ramesh Chandre Aggarwal, finding that the plaintiff failed to prove publication of defamatory statements or quantifiable losses. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: no witnesses to alleged defamatory messages, unproven digital screenshots lacking Section 65B certificates, no income documentation, and hearsay testimony from the plaintiff herself about WhatsApp group messages she wasn't part of. Additionally, the plaintiff imposed costs of Rs 3,000 on the plaintiff for filing vexatious litigation following the defendant's prior recovery suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case