MOHD NAEEM AND ORS vs MCD AND ORS — 117/2025

Case under Regular Civil Appeal Section 96. Status: Misc. cases/purpose. Next hearing: 20th August 2026.

Misc. cases/purpose Next hearing 20-Aug-2026

RCA DJ - REG. CIVIL APPEAL DJ and ADJ

CNR: DLCT010112652025

e-Filing Number

26-07-2025

Filing Number

7036/2025

Filing Date

28-Jul-2025

Registration No

117/2025

Registration Date

29-Jul-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Central, THC

Judge

9-District Judge

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Regular Civil Appeal Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD NAEEM AND ORS

    Adv. ARUN KUMAR YADAV

  2. 2.MOHD TAHSEEN

    Adv. ARUN KUMAR YADAV

  3. 3.MOHD TAMKEEN

    Adv. ARUN KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MCD AND ORS

Case History

  1. 20-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-May-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    In Case 7 RCA DJ 117/25 (MOHD NAEEM vs. MCD), the Delhi High Court adjourned the matter for arguments on 20.08.2026. Respondent No. 5 filed a reply to the appeal, which Respondent No. 6 and their legal representatives adopted, while other respondents declined to file replies and opted to address arguments directly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  8. 14-Oct-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  9. 14-Oct-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  10. 29-Jul-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  11. 29-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 28-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 117/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 7 RCA DJ 117/25 (MOHD NAEEM vs. MCD), the Delhi High Court adjourned the matter for arguments on 20.08.2026. Respondent No. 5 filed a reply to the appeal, which Respondent No. 6 and their legal representatives adopted, while other respondents declined to file replies and opted to address arguments directly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case