STATE OF DELHI vs SAHIL GOHAR — 390/2026
Case under Indian Arms Act 1959 Section 25/54/59. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLCT010036482026
Filing Number
1282/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
390/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Central, THC
Judge
33-SPECIAL JUDGE (NDPS)
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
Crime Branch-Central Delhi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF DELHI
Respondent(s)
SAHIL GOHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 33-SPECIAL JUDGE (NDPS)
Disposed
For Bail
For Bail
For Bail
For Bail
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 18-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 14-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 02-03-2026 | For Bail |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court dismissed Sahil Kumar Gohar's second anticipatory bail application in an illegal arms case under the Arms Act. The applicant was alleged to be the supplier of a semi-automatic pistol recovered from co-accused Sagar Babbar, with evidence suggesting a second pistol remained in his possession. The court found the allegations serious and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary for investigating the case, recovering remaining weapons, and identifying other accused persons. No change in circumstances justified granting bail after the previous application's dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The court dismissed Sahil Kumar Gohar's second anticipatory bail application in an illegal arms case under the Arms Act. The applicant was alleged to be the supplier of a semi-automatic pistol recovered from co-accused Sagar Babbar, with evidence suggesting a second pistol remained in his possession. The court found the allegations serious and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary for investigating the case, recovering remaining weapons, and identifying other accused persons. No change in circumstances justified granting bail after the previous application's dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts