BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. vs POOJA — 179/2025
Case under Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE on 14th March 2026.
Ct. Cases - COMPLAINT CASES
CNR: DLCT010014282025
e-Filing Number
23-01-2025
Filing Number
513/2025
Filing Date
24-Jan-2025
Registration No
179/2025
Registration Date
28-Jan-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Central, THC
Judge
32-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Rajouri Garden
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.
Adv. KAPIL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.POOJA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
Summary of Case 179/2025 – BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. v. POOJA The court disposed of the electricity theft case against Pooja after finding that the civil liability regarding the disputed electricity bill had been settled under the MCC scheme through a connected case. Given that the accused had no prior criminal involvement and had already settled the financial liability, the court granted Pooja the benefit of Section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 with admonishment, deeming this sufficient to meet the ends of justice. Any bail bond was canceled and sureties discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Misc./ Appearance
Additional Sessions Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
14-Oct-2025
Misc./ Appearance
Additional Sessions Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
Misc. Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge
-
01-May-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
01-May-2025
Misc./ Appearance
Additional Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 179/2025
Summary of Case 179/2025 – BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. v. POOJA The court disposed of the electricity theft case against Pooja after finding that the civil liability regarding the disputed electricity bill had been settled under the MCC scheme through a connected case. Given that the accused had no prior criminal involvement and had already settled the financial liability, the court granted Pooja the benefit of Section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 with admonishment, deeming this sufficient to meet the ends of justice. Any bail bond was canceled and sureties discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts