ARJUN KOHLI vs KRISHNA CHANAKYA Advocate - C — 611161/2016
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd May 2026.
CS DJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLCT010004282013
Filing Number
42919/2013
Filing Date
29-08-2013
Registration No
611161/2016
Registration Date
29-08-2013
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Central, THC
Judge
9-District Judge
Decision Date
23rd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Petitioner(s)
ARJUN KOHLI
Respondent(s)
KRISHNA CHANAKYA Advocate - C
Hearing History
Judge: 9-District Judge
Disposed
Final Arguments
Final Arguments
Final Arguments
Final Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | Final Arguments |
| 14-03-2026 | Final Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Final Arguments |
| 31-01-2026 | Final Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Arjun Kohli v. M/s Krishna Chanakya (CS 11161/2016) The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking recovery of ₹12,48,347 for allegedly unpaid printing material supplies. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish any direct business dealings with the defendants, relying solely on hearsay from a salesman without purchase orders, delivery receipts, or invoices signed by defendant no. 2. Critical to the dismissal was the plaintiff's concealment of an FIR against his own employees for fraud involving the disputed transactions, which undermined his credibility and case foundation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Arjun Kohli v. M/s Krishna Chanakya (CS 11161/2016) The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking recovery of ₹12,48,347 for allegedly unpaid printing material supplies. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish any direct business dealings with the defendants, relying solely on hearsay from a salesman without purchase orders, delivery receipts, or invoices signed by defendant no. 2. Critical to the dismissal was the plaintiff's concealment of an FIR against his own employees for fraud involving the disputed transactions, which undermined his credibility and case foundation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts