BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. vs SUMAN — 71/2025

Case under Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE on 04th April 2026.

Ct. Cases - COMPLAINT CASES

CNR: DLCT010000912025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

01-01-2025

Filing Number

53/2025

Filing Date

04-01-2025

Registration No

71/2025

Registration Date

17-01-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Central, THC

Judge

32-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

04th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISE

FIR Details

Police Station

Rajouri Garden

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.

Adv. Praduman Rai

Respondent(s)

SUMAN

Hearing History

Judge: 32-Additional Sessions Judge

04-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Misc./ Appearance

26-02-2026

Misc./ Appearance

08-01-2026

Misc./ Appearance

18-12-2025

Misc./ Appearance

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

In Case 71/2025, BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. v. Suman, the accused pleaded guilty to the electricity theft offense after the civil liability was settled through mediation on 30.10.2025, with full payment made. The court, after duly warning the accused about legal consequences and confirming her voluntary plea, accepted the guilty plea and adjourned the matter to 04.04.2026 for reports on the accused's criminal history and probation officer assessment before deciding on sentencing and the accused's request for probation benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 71/2025, BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. v. Suman, the accused pleaded guilty to the electricity theft offense after the civil liability was settled through mediation on 30.10.2025, with full payment made. The court, after duly warning the accused about legal consequences and confirming her voluntary plea, accepted the guilty plea and adjourned the matter to 04.04.2026 for reports on the accused's criminal history and probation officer assessment before deciding on sentencing and the accused's request for probation benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Central, THC All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case