LALAN PASWAN vs TARA DEVI Advocate - KUMAR RAJESH RANJAN — 625/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRWC220008082018
Filing Number
865/2018
Filing Date
23-Dec-2018
Registration No
625/2018
Registration Date
23-Dec-2018
Court
Narkatiaganj Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LALAN PASWAN
Adv. SHEO NARAIN PRASAD
-
2.LALBABU PASWAN
Adv. RAMAN KUMAR SHRIWASTVA
-
3.HIRA PASWAN
-
4.JAWAHIR PASWAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.TARA DEVI Advocate - KUMAR RAJESH RANJAN
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
22-Apr-2026
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
12-Mar-2026
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
28-Jan-2026
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
19-Nov-2025
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
10-Sep-2025
Issues
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
05-Jul-2025
Issues
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
23-Apr-2025
Issues
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
27-Feb-2025
Issues
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
10-Jan-2025
Issues
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
22-Nov-2024
Issues
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
19-Sep-2024
Issues
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
02-Aug-2024
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M
-
11-Jun-2024
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M
-
04-May-2024
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
13-Mar-2024
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
06-Feb-2024
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
21-Dec-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
07-Nov-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
21-Sep-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
11-Aug-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
13-Jul-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
03-Jun-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
03-May-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
18-Mar-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
15-Feb-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
04-Feb-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
11-Jan-2023
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
17-Dec-2022
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
30-Nov-2022
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
15-Nov-2022
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
02-Nov-2022
Order
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
15-Oct-2022
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
07-Sep-2022
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
06-Aug-2022
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
19-Jul-2022
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
21-May-2022
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
25-Mar-2022
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
10-Feb-2022
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
18-Dec-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
03-Nov-2021
IA OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 625/2018 The court dismissed the petitioners' application as premature. The petitioners (Lalan Paswan and others) sought a declaration of ownership and permanent injunction regarding disputed land, claiming the respondent (Tara Devi) had acknowledged their claims in paragraphs 10 and 16-18 of her written statement. However, the court found that the respondent's acknowledgment of the petitioners' statement regarding their father's name in the land records does not constitute admission of the substantive dispute itself. The court held that whether the respondent actually admitted the petitioners' claims or merely acknowledged certain factual details is a mixed question of law and fact that can only be resolved through evidence during trial proceedings. Accordingly, the petitioners' application was dismissed with directions to proceed under the Land Records Act on 18.12.2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Nov-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
27-Oct-2021
Order
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
12-Aug-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
02-Jul-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
28-May-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
08-Apr-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
01-Mar-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
19-Jan-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
01-Dec-2020
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
14-Oct-2020
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
28-Aug-2020
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
27-Jul-2020
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
11-Jun-2020
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
19-May-2020
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
27-Apr-2020
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
30-Mar-2020
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
26-Feb-2020
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
05-Feb-2020
Hearing
Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M
-
25-Jan-2020
Hearing
Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M
-
07-Jan-2020
Hearing
Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M
-
23-Dec-2019
Hearing
Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M
-
07-Dec-2019
Hearing
Subjudge
-
25-Oct-2019
Hearing
Subjudge
-
07-Sep-2019
Hearing
Subjudge
-
20-Jul-2019
Hearing
Subjudge
-
27-May-2019
Hearing
Subjudge
-
15-Apr-2019
Hearing
Subjudge
-
15-Mar-2019
Hearing
Subjudge
-
21-Feb-2019
Hearing
Subjudge
-
02-Feb-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 625/2018
Case Summary: 625/2018 The court dismissed the petitioners' application as premature. The petitioners (Lalan Paswan and others) sought a declaration of ownership and permanent injunction regarding disputed land, claiming the respondent (Tara Devi) had acknowledged their claims in paragraphs 10 and 16-18 of her written statement. However, the court found that the respondent's acknowledgment of the petitioners' statement regarding their father's name in the land records does not constitute admission of the substantive dispute itself. The court held that whether the respondent actually admitted the petitioners' claims or merely acknowledged certain factual details is a mixed question of law and fact that can only be resolved through evidence during trial proceedings. Accordingly, the petitioners' application was dismissed with directions to proceed under the Land Records Act on 18.12.2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts