SAUKAT MIYA vs JOKHU SAH@AMARESH SAH AND OTHERS Advocate - LAKSHMAN PRASAD — 547/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: Evicence of defendent / Op. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Evicence of defendent / Op Next hearing 05-Jun-2026

Title Suit

CNR: BRWC220006672018

Filing Number

724/2018

Filing Date

22-Dec-2018

Registration No

547/2018

Registration Date

22-Dec-2018

Court

Narkatiaganj Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 09

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAUKAT MIYA

    Adv. AMIT VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JOKHU SAH@AMARESH SAH AND OTHERS Advocate - LAKSHMAN PRASAD

  2. 2.UMESH SAH

    Adv. LAKSHMAN PRASAD

  3. 3.BHULAN SAH

    Adv. LAKSHMAN PRASAD

  4. 4.RAJENDRA SAH

    Adv. MD JAWED AKHTAR

  5. 5.RAJKESHWAR SAH

    Adv. MD JAWED AKHTAR

  6. 6.SANJAY KUMAR

  7. 7.BABLU KUMAR

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-May-2026

    Evicence of defendent / Op

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  7. 10-Nov-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  8. 23-Sep-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  9. 12-Aug-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  10. 01-Jul-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  11. 22-May-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  12. 08-Apr-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  13. 27-Feb-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  14. 24-Jan-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  15. 19-Dec-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  16. 28-Oct-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  17. 09-Sep-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  18. 30-Aug-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

  19. 08-Aug-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

  20. 26-Jul-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

  21. 24-Jun-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

  22. 01-Jun-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  23. 13-May-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  24. 28-Mar-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  25. 13-Feb-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  26. 12-Jan-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  27. 28-Nov-2023

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  28. 25-Sep-2023

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  29. 28-Aug-2023

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  30. 18-Jul-2023

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  31. 01-Jun-2023

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  32. 24-Apr-2023

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  33. 16-Feb-2023

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  34. 21-Dec-2022

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  35. 18-Nov-2022

    IA OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 547/2018 Petitioner: Saukat Miya | Respondent: Jokhu Sah @ Amaresh Sah and Others Order Date: 18.11.2022 Outcome: The court accepted the application filed by respondents (Sanjay Kumar and Bablu Kumar) dated 15.12.2020 under Rule 10(2) CPC and impleaded them as necessary parties/respondents in the suit. The court rejected the plaintiff's counter-arguments that the respondents had no right or interest in the disputed land. The case was adjourned to 21.12.2022 for further proceedings. The respondents' application to become parties to the suit was allowed, as the court found they had a legitimate interest in the property dispute involving land account 194, plot 418. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  36. 18-Nov-2022

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  37. 09-Nov-2022

    Order

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  38. 18-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  39. 05-Sep-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  40. 19-Jul-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  41. 23-Jun-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  42. 10-May-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  43. 09-Mar-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  44. 09-Feb-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  45. 10-Jan-2022

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  46. 06-Dec-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  47. 05-Oct-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  48. 07-Sep-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  49. 03-Aug-2021

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  50. 23-Jun-2021

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  51. 19-May-2021

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  52. 12-Apr-2021

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  53. 08-Mar-2021

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  54. 03-Feb-2021

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  55. 15-Dec-2020

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  56. 13-Nov-2020

    Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  57. 25-Sep-2020

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  58. 28-Aug-2020

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  59. 27-Jul-2020

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  60. 20-Jun-2020

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  61. 29-May-2020

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  62. 05-May-2020

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  63. 15-Apr-2020

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  64. 26-Feb-2020

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  65. 06-Feb-2020

    Hearing

    Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

  66. 22-Jan-2020

    Hearing

    Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

  67. 06-Jan-2020

    Hearing

    Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

  68. 07-Dec-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  69. 21-Oct-2019

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  70. 02-Sep-2019

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  71. 09-Jul-2019

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  72. 17-May-2019

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Subjudge

  73. 25-Mar-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  74. 24-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  75. 22-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 547/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 547/2018 Petitioner: Saukat Miya | Respondent: Jokhu Sah @ Amaresh Sah and Others Order Date: 18.11.2022 Outcome: The court accepted the application filed by respondents (Sanjay Kumar and Bablu Kumar) dated 15.12.2020 under Rule 10(2) CPC and impleaded them as necessary parties/respondents in the suit. The court rejected the plaintiff's counter-arguments that the respondents had no right or interest in the disputed land. The case was adjourned to 21.12.2022 for further proceedings. The respondents' application to become parties to the suit was allowed, as the court found they had a legitimate interest in the property dispute involving land account 194, plot 418. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case