EKABAL SAH vs VIJENDRA RAO AND OTHERS Advocate - ANIRUDH KUMAR SINGH — 301/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE on 12th March 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRWC220004352019
Filing Number
435/2019
Filing Date
29-Jun-2019
Registration No
301/2019
Registration Date
29-Jun-2019
Court
Narkatiaganj Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.EKABAL SAH
Adv. LAKSHMAN PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIJENDRA RAO AND OTHERS Advocate - ANIRUDH KUMAR SINGH
-
2.BRIJKISHOR RAO
Adv. RAVINDRA UPADHYAY
-
3.JITENDRA RAO
-
4.ASHOK SINGH
Adv. ANIRUDH KUMAR SINGH
-
5.AVADH KISHOR SINGH
-
6.JOKHAN RAO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Final OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 301/2019 – Ekabal Sah v. Vijendra Rao and Others The court approved an amicable settlement between petitioner Ekabal Sah and respondents Vijendra Rao and others regarding a property dispute. The settlement deed established conditions for a 10-foot pathway on disputed land (from east to west, south of the northern 20-foot portion), granting usage rights to both parties with a clause invalidating a previously disputed 1990 deed document. The court dismissed the suit based on the mutual settlement agreement signed by all parties and directed both parties to bear their own legal costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
22-Dec-2025
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
18-Dec-2025
Order / Judgement
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
11-Dec-2025
Sarishtadar Report
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
17-Nov-2025
Sarishtadar Report
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
03-Nov-2025
Sarishtadar Report
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
09-Oct-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
12-Sep-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
26-Aug-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
05-Aug-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
19-Jul-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
09-Jul-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
16-Jun-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
06-Jun-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
26-May-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
16-May-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
24-Apr-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
17-Mar-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
21-Feb-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
30-Jan-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
08-Jan-2025
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
09-Dec-2024
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
22-Nov-2024
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
24-Oct-2024
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
20-Sep-2024
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
07-Sep-2024
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
17-Aug-2024
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M
-
21-Jun-2024
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M
-
03-May-2024
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
23-Mar-2024
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
23-Feb-2024
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
18-Jan-2024
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
14-Dec-2023
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
24-Nov-2023
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
16-Oct-2023
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
25-Sep-2023
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
03-Aug-2023
W.S
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
21-Jul-2023
W.S
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
02-Jun-2023
W.S
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
24-Apr-2023
W.S
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
02-Mar-2023
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
30-Jan-2023
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
10-Jan-2023
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
16-Dec-2022
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
21-Oct-2022
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
28-Sep-2022
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
13-Sep-2022
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
28-Jun-2022
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
06-May-2022
Appearence
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
01-Apr-2022
Appearence
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
23-Feb-2022
Appearence
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
17-Jan-2022
Appearence
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
02-Nov-2021
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
18-Aug-2021
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
17-Jun-2021
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
13-Apr-2021
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
25-Feb-2021
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
12-Jan-2021
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
14-Dec-2020
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
29-Sep-2020
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
18-Aug-2020
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
08-Jun-2020
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
15-May-2020
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
23-Apr-2020
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
16-Mar-2020
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
04-Feb-2020
Appearence
Subjudge
-
20-Dec-2019
Appearence
Subjudge
-
06-Dec-2019
Appearence
Subjudge
-
25-Oct-2019
Appearence
Subjudge
-
01-Oct-2019
Appearence
Subjudge
-
20-Sep-2019
Appearence
Subjudge
-
09-Sep-2019
Appearence
Subjudge
-
22-Jul-2019
Appearence
Subjudge
-
19-Jul-2019
For Removal Of Defect
Subjudge
-
16-Jul-2019
Sarishtadar Report
Subjudge
-
09-Jul-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jun-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 301/2019
Summary of Case 301/2019 – Ekabal Sah v. Vijendra Rao and Others The court approved an amicable settlement between petitioner Ekabal Sah and respondents Vijendra Rao and others regarding a property dispute. The settlement deed established conditions for a 10-foot pathway on disputed land (from east to west, south of the northern 20-foot portion), granting usage rights to both parties with a clause invalidating a previously disputed 1990 deed document. The court dismissed the suit based on the mutual settlement agreement signed by all parties and directed both parties to bear their own legal costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts