SHANKAR SAH AND OTHERS vs BAIJUL KAMAR AND OTHER Advocate - NASIMUL HAQUE, ISLAM KHAN, ISLAM KHANABHISHEK KUMAR, — 269/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: Documents. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Documents Next hearing 13-Jul-2026

Title Suit

CNR: BRWC220003752023

Filing Number

375/2023

Filing Date

12-Dec-2023

Registration No

269/2023

Registration Date

12-Dec-2023

Court

Narkatiaganj Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 09

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANKAR SAH AND OTHERS

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR CHAUBEY

  2. 2.HARENDRA SAH

  3. 3.MAHENDRA SAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BAIJUL KAMAR AND OTHER Advocate - NASIMUL HAQUE, ISLAM KHAN, ISLAM KHANABHISHEK KUMAR,

  2. 2.SAKUL KAMAR

    Adv. NASIMUL HAQUE

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Documents

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  4. 23-May-2026

    Order

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  5. 07-May-2026

    Documents

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Documents

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Documents

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    IA OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 269/2023 On 11.12.2025, the court accepted the petitioner's amendment application dated 31.01.2025 filed under Order 6, Rule 17 of CPC. The court permitted the petitioners (Shankar Sah and others) to amend their plaint to clarify disputed land account entries and rectify discrepancies in account records relating to land plots. The respondent's objection that the amendment was not maintainable was rejected, as the proposed modifications were found to be related to the case and would enable effective adjudication. The case was adjourned to 17.02.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 11-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  11. 01-Dec-2025

    Order

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  13. 04-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  14. 13-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  15. 18-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  16. 31-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  17. 19-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  18. 01-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  19. 05-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  20. 05-May-2025

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  21. 21-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  22. 03-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  23. 11-Mar-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  24. 28-Feb-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  25. 12-Feb-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  26. 31-Jan-2025

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  27. 10-Jan-2025

    Documents

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  28. 23-Dec-2024

    Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  29. 30-Sep-2024

    Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  30. 23-Aug-2024

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  31. 31-May-2024

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  32. 04-Mar-2024

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  33. 30-Jan-2024

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  34. 22-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 12-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 269/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 269/2023 On 11.12.2025, the court accepted the petitioner's amendment application dated 31.01.2025 filed under Order 6, Rule 17 of CPC. The court permitted the petitioners (Shankar Sah and others) to amend their plaint to clarify disputed land account entries and rectify discrepancies in account records relating to land plots. The respondent's objection that the amendment was not maintainable was rejected, as the proposed modifications were found to be related to the case and would enable effective adjudication. The case was adjourned to 17.02.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case