KISHUNDEO YADAV AND OTHER vs FULKUMARI DEVI AND OTHERS — 239/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Appearence Next hearing 22-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit

CNR: BRWC220003582025

Filing Number

358/2025

Filing Date

06-Dec-2025

Registration No

239/2025

Registration Date

06-Dec-2025

Court

Narkatiaganj Civil Division

Judge

2-Munsif

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 09

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHUNDEO YADAV AND OTHER

    Adv. DEWANSHU KUMAR

  2. 2.KAPILDEO YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FULKUMARI DEVI AND OTHERS

  2. 2.RUDAL RAM

  3. 3.CHHOTELAL RAM

  4. 4.BIHAR SARKAR MARFAT CALECTAR WEST CHAMPARAN

  5. 5.ANUMANDAL PADADHIKARI NARKATIAGANJ

  6. 6.BHUMI SUDHAR UP SAMAHARTA NARKATIAGANJ

  7. 7.ANCHAL ADHIKARI MAINATAND

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Appearence

    Munsif

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Appearence

    Munsif

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    IA OrderView PDF

    Summary The court appointed a court-commissioned advocate (Advocate Commissioner) to inspect the disputed property and submit a report with photographs within 15 days to determine the current status of the land in dispute. The case was adjourned to 27.02.2026 for the Advocate Commissioner's report, with costs of ₹2,000 to be borne by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Appearence

    Munsif

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    Munsif

  7. 16-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 239/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court appointed a court-commissioned advocate (Advocate Commissioner) to inspect the disputed property and submit a report with photographs within 15 days to determine the current status of the land in dispute. The case was adjourned to 27.02.2026 for the Advocate Commissioner's report, with costs of ₹2,000 to be borne by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case