LAKSHMAN YADAV AND OTHERS vs KISHORI YADAV AND OTHERS Advocate - AJAY KUMAR CHAUBEY — 290/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRWC220002872018
Filing Number
344/2018
Filing Date
18-Dec-2018
Registration No
290/2018
Registration Date
18-Dec-2018
Court
Narkatiaganj Civil Division
Judge
2-Munsif
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAKSHMAN YADAV AND OTHERS
Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR DWIVEDI
-
2.MUKESH YADAV
-
3.MUKHARANI DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.KISHORI YADAV AND OTHERS Advocate - AJAY KUMAR CHAUBEY
-
2.LALBABU SAH
-
3.DHRUP YADAV
Case History
-
11-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Apr-2026
Arguments
Munsif
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Munsif
-
10-Feb-2026
Arguments
Munsif
-
20-Jan-2026
Arguments
Munsif
-
24-Dec-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
04-Dec-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
21-Nov-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
07-Oct-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
11-Sep-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
22-Aug-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
24-Jul-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
05-Jul-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
16-Jun-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
23-May-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
02-May-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
07-Apr-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
18-Mar-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
20-Feb-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
01-Feb-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
15-Jan-2025
Arguments
Munsif
-
16-Dec-2024
Arguments
Munsif
-
25-Nov-2024
Arguments
Munsif
-
25-Oct-2024
Arguments
Munsif
-
19-Sep-2024
Arguments
Munsif
-
27-Aug-2024
Arguments
Munsif
-
06-Aug-2024
Arguments
Munsif
-
19-Jul-2024
Arguments
Munsif
-
01-Jul-2024
Arguments
Munsif
-
10-Jun-2024
Arguments
Munsif
-
07-May-2024
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
25-Apr-2024
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
19-Mar-2024
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
16-Feb-2024
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
11-Jan-2024
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
29-Nov-2023
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
17-Oct-2023
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
22-Sep-2023
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
25-Aug-2023
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
21-Jul-2023
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
19-Jun-2023
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
29-May-2023
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
08-May-2023
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
03-Apr-2023
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
21-Feb-2023
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
03-Feb-2023
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
03-Jan-2023
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
03-Dec-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
18-Oct-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
02-Sep-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
16-Aug-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
22-Jul-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
04-Jul-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
16-Jun-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
10-May-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
20-Apr-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
29-Mar-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
10-Mar-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
22-Feb-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
15-Feb-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
25-Jan-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
18-Jan-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
07-Jan-2022
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
13-Dec-2021
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
22-Nov-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
22-Oct-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
23-Sep-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
02-Sep-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
09-Aug-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
17-Jul-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
25-Jun-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
04-Jun-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
10-May-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
19-Apr-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
25-Mar-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
20-Feb-2021
IA OrderView PDF
The court admitted the plaintiff's application (filed with delay) to exhibit 6 public documents relating to disputed land, dating back 30+ years, despite the substantial delay in filing. The court imposed a cost of ₹700 and directed the office to mark the documents on record, with further proceedings scheduled for March 25, 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Feb-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
29-Jan-2021
Hearing
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
15-Jan-2021
Order
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
02-Jan-2021
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
22-Dec-2020
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
25-Nov-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
06-Nov-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
05-Oct-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
25-Sep-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
11-Sep-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
28-Aug-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
27-Jul-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
02-Jul-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
17-Jun-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
08-Jun-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
15-May-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
23-Apr-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
26-Mar-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
12-Mar-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
04-Mar-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
18-Feb-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
05-Feb-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
20-Jan-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
04-Jan-2020
Arguments
Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M
-
09-Dec-2019
Arguments
Munsif
-
02-Dec-2019
Arguments
Munsif
-
11-Nov-2019
Arguments
Munsif
-
18-Oct-2019
Arguments
Munsif
-
26-Sep-2019
Arguments
Munsif
-
07-Sep-2019
Arguments
Munsif
-
20-Aug-2019
Arguments
Munsif
-
29-Jul-2019
Arguments
Munsif
-
01-Jul-2019
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Munsif
-
27-May-2019
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Munsif
-
20-Apr-2019
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Munsif
-
13-Mar-2019
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Munsif
-
22-Feb-2019
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Munsif
-
22-Dec-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Dec-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 290/2018
The court admitted the plaintiff's application (filed with delay) to exhibit 6 public documents relating to disputed land, dating back 30+ years, despite the substantial delay in filing. The court imposed a cost of ₹700 and directed the office to mark the documents on record, with further proceedings scheduled for March 25, 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts