ARUNTI DEVI vs SHASHIBHUSHAN PANDEY @ CHANDRA BHUSHAN PANDEY Advocate - LAKSHMAN PRASAD, MD JAWED AKHTAR — 232/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRWC220002192018
Next Hearing
21st May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
276/2018
Filing Date
18-12-2018
Registration No
232/2018
Registration Date
18-12-2018
Court
Narkatiaganj Civil Division
Judge
2-Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARUNTI DEVI
Adv. SUNIL KUMAR CHAUBEY
Respondent(s)
SHASHIBHUSHAN PANDEY @ CHANDRA BHUSHAN PANDEY Advocate - LAKSHMAN PRASAD, MD JAWED AKHTAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Munsif
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 13-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 13-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 05-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed the defendant's application dated 04-09-2025 filed under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC for local inspection of the disputed property. The court held that since the case is in its final stage of execution with arguments already heard, entertaining such an application would amount to reopening evidence, which is impermissible under established legal precedent. The case is adjourned to 05-01-2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the defendant's application dated 04-09-2025 filed under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC for local inspection of the disputed property. The court held that since the case is in its final stage of execution with arguments already heard, entertaining such an application would amount to reopening evidence, which is impermissible under established legal precedent. The case is adjourned to 05-01-2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts