RAMESH CHANDRA SRIWASTAWA vs ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND OTHERS Advocate - KUMAR RAJESH RANJAN, OM PRAKASH MISHRA — 101/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Title Suit

CNR: BRWC220001512020

HEARING

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

151/2020

Filing Date

09-11-2020

Registration No

101/2020

Registration Date

09-11-2020

Court

Narkatiaganj Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

RAMESH CHANDRA SRIWASTAWA

Adv. RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA

Respondent(s)

ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND OTHERS Advocate - KUMAR RAJESH RANJAN, OM PRAKASH MISHRA

RAVISHANKAR PRASAD

Adv. KUMAR RAJESH RANJAN,OM PRAKASH MISHRA

DINESH PRASAD

MANJU DEVI

Adv. KUMAR RAJESH RANJAN,OM PRAKASH MISHRA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

28-04-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

05-02-2026

HEARING

04-02-2026

HEARING

10-12-2025

HEARING

Interim Orders

22-02-2024
IA Order

Case Summary: 101/2020 Ramesh Chandra Srivastava v. Arvind Kumar Srivastava and Others In this property dispute heard on 22.02.2024, the court accepted the written statement of Respondents 01, 02, and 04 on a bond of Rs. 1,500, allowing them to contest the case despite their delayed filing. The court recognized that the respondents faced difficulty locating old property-related documents and found their delay to be circumstantial rather than intentional. The case was adjourned to 27.03.2024 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 101/2020 Ramesh Chandra Srivastava v. Arvind Kumar Srivastava and Others In this property dispute heard on 22.02.2024, the court accepted the written statement of Respondents 01, 02, and 04 on a bond of Rs. 1,500, allowing them to contest the case despite their delayed filing. The court recognized that the respondents faced difficulty locating old property-related documents and found their delay to be circumstantial rather than intentional. The case was adjourned to 27.03.2024 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Narkatiaganj Civil Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case