SHEKH SHAHID AND OTHER vs SHEKH BAHRAM AND OTHERS — 44/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

Partion Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT

CNR: BRWC220001462021

Filing Number

146/2021

Filing Date

10-Sep-2021

Registration No

44/2021

Registration Date

10-Sep-2021

Court

Narkatiaganj Civil Division

Judge

3-Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHEKH SHAHID AND OTHER

    Adv. SHEO NARAIN PRASAD

  2. 2.SHEKH MAHID

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHEKH BAHRAM AND OTHERS

  2. 2.SHEKH SERAJ

  3. 3.SK SARFARAJ

  4. 4.BIBI RAUSHAN ARA

  5. 5.BIBI YUGNI ARA

  6. 6.SK AJMULLAH

  7. 7.MUNNI BEGUM

  8. 8.JHUNNI BEGUM

  9. 9.NOORJAHAN BEGUM

  10. 10.ASROON NESHA

  11. 11.SABROON NESHA

  12. 12.SHAHJAHAN BEGUM

  13. 13.ALIMUN KHATOON

  14. 14.JHALIMUN KHATOON

  15. 15.SHEKH HASMUDDIN

  16. 16.SHEKH RAJJAK

    Adv. ASHWANI RAMAN

  17. 17.SHEKH SALLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 44/2021 The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for partition of disputed agricultural land totaling 1 bigha 11 kattha 5 dhur located in Moza-Barwa, Bihar. The judge found that the plaintiffs failed to establish joint ownership and possession of the land among all parties, as they could not adequately prove their claims through documentary evidence (particularly regarding property acquired by one co-owner through separate purchase) and could not make necessary co-owners parties to the suit. The case was dismissed as defective for want of proper parties and insufficient proof of claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  10. 01-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  11. 04-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  12. 11-Sep-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  13. 15-Jul-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  14. 15-May-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  15. 27-Feb-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  16. 18-Jan-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  17. 19-Dec-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  18. 19-Oct-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  19. 05-Sep-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  20. 25-Jul-2024

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

  21. 07-Jun-2024

    Appearence

    Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

  22. 15-Apr-2024

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  23. 18-Jan-2024

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  24. 12-Oct-2023

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  25. 13-Jul-2023

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  26. 26-Apr-2023

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  27. 25-Jan-2023

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  28. 04-Nov-2022

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  29. 22-Aug-2022

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  30. 27-Jun-2022

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  31. 05-May-2022

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  32. 02-Mar-2022

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  33. 12-Jan-2022

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  34. 03-Dec-2021

    Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  35. 22-Nov-2021

    Sarishtadar Report

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  36. 01-Nov-2021

    Sarishtadar Report

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  37. 08-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 10-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 44/2021 The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for partition of disputed agricultural land totaling 1 bigha 11 kattha 5 dhur located in Moza-Barwa, Bihar. The judge found that the plaintiffs failed to establish joint ownership and possession of the land among all parties, as they could not adequately prove their claims through documentary evidence (particularly regarding property acquired by one co-owner through separate purchase) and could not make necessary co-owners parties to the suit. The case was dismissed as defective for want of proper parties and insufficient proof of claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case