RAMESH DUBEY AND OTHERS vs VIJAY KUMAR DWIDEVI AND OTHER Advocate - SHEO NARAIN PRASAD, ANUP KUMAR DUBEY, ANUP KUMAR DUBEYBHUWANESHWAR MISHRA, — 95/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRWC220001302023
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
130/2023
Filing Date
18-05-2023
Registration No
95/2023
Registration Date
18-05-2023
Court
Narkatiaganj Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMESH DUBEY AND OTHERS
Adv. AJAY KUMAR CHAUBEY
ARUN KUMAR DIWEDI
Adv. VIKASH KUMAR CHAUBEY
ASHOK KUMAR DUBEY
Adv. AJIT KUMAR CHAUBEY
Respondent(s)
VIJAY KUMAR DWIDEVI AND OTHER Advocate - SHEO NARAIN PRASAD, ANUP KUMAR DUBEY, ANUP KUMAR DUBEYBHUWANESHWAR MISHRA,
UDAY KUMAR DUBEY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
HEARING
HEARING
REJOINDER
REJOINDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 29-01-2026 | REJOINDER |
| 14-11-2025 | REJOINDER |
| 23-09-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 95/2023 Court: Subordinate Judge, Narakatiyaganj Petitioner: Ramesh Dubey and Others Respondent: Vijay Kumar Dwivedi and Others Date of Order: 13.02.2024 Outcome: The court dismissed the petitioner's injunction application filed under CPC Rule 39 (1 & 2) and Section 151 dated 16.06.2023. The petitioners sought to restrain the respondents from constructing on and selling the disputed property pending final case determination. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish: (1) a prima facie case in their favor, (2) balance of convenience supporting their position, or (3) that irreparable injury would result from dismissal. The court noted inconsistencies in the petitioners' claims regarding property ownership and possession. The case was adjourned to 13.03.2024 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 95/2023 Court: Subordinate Judge, Narakatiyaganj Petitioner: Ramesh Dubey and Others Respondent: Vijay Kumar Dwivedi and Others Date of Order: 13.02.2024 Outcome: The court dismissed the petitioner's injunction application filed under CPC Rule 39 (1 & 2) and Section 151 dated 16.06.2023. The petitioners sought to restrain the respondents from constructing on and selling the disputed property pending final case determination. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish: (1) a prima facie case in their favor, (2) balance of convenience supporting their position, or (3) that irreparable injury would result from dismissal. The court noted inconsistencies in the petitioners' claims regarding property ownership and possession. The case was adjourned to 13.03.2024 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts