BASDEO MAHTO vs SURASATI DEVI AND OTHERS Advocate - BIRESHWAR KUMAR — 24/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
Partion Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT
CNR: BRWC220001212023
Filing Number
121/2023
Filing Date
08-May-2023
Registration No
24/2023
Registration Date
08-May-2023
Court
Narkatiaganj Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BASDEO MAHTO
Adv. KUMAR RAJESH RANJAN, GAURAV SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURASATI DEVI AND OTHERS Advocate - BIRESHWAR KUMAR
-
2.GOPI MAHTO
-
3.AJAY MAHTO
Adv. BIRESHWAR KUMAR
-
4.BIKAU MAHTO
-
5.MARACHHO DEVI
Adv. BIRESHWAR KUMAR
-
6.THAGO DEVI
-
7.NAGO DEVI
-
8.GULABO DEVI
-
9.RUPAM DEVI
-
10.MO MARCHI DEVI
-
11.JANKI DEVI
Adv. AJAY KUMAR CHAUBEY
-
12.PARSHURAM MAHTO
Adv. AJAY KUMAR CHAUBEY
-
13.PRATIMA DEVI
Adv. AJAY KUMAR CHAUBEY
-
14.SHAMBHU SAH
Adv. SHEO NARAIN PRASAD
-
15.MANOJ SAH
Adv. SHEO NARAIN PRASAD
-
16.RAKESH KUSHWAHA
Adv. AJAY KUMAR CHAUBEY
-
17.JAYSHRI DEVI
Adv. AJIT KUMAR CHAUBEY
-
18.PRABHU SAH
Adv. SUDAMA TIWARI
-
19.BALIRAM MAHTO
Adv. BHUWANESHWAR MISHRA
-
20.RAJMOHAN SAH
-
21.LALAN MAHTO
Adv. SHEO NARAIN PRASAD
-
22.CHHOTELAL SAH
Adv. SHEO NARAIN PRASAD
-
23.RAJUL MIYA
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
IA OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 24/2023 Court: Sukul Ram Junior Judge Court, Narkatiaganj Petitioner: Basdeo Mahto | Respondent: Surasati Devi and Others Order Date: 29.05.2026 Outcome: The court accepted the petitioner's application for modification of court fees from ₹1,000 to ₹1,000 (maintaining the fee at ₹1,000) under Order 6, Rule 18 and Section 151 of the CPC. The petitioner was permitted to amend the plaint within the statutory time limit. The case was adjourned to 19.06.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
20-May-2026
Order
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
18-Mar-2026
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
29-Jan-2026
IA OrderView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
17-Jan-2026
Order
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
09-Dec-2025
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
29-Oct-2025
IA OrderView PDF
-
29-Oct-2025
Hearing
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
15-Oct-2025
Order
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
10-Sep-2025
Rejoinder
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
30-Jul-2025
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
11-Jun-2025
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
07-May-2025
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
02-Apr-2025
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
01-Mar-2025
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
28-Jan-2025
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
18-Dec-2024
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
20-Nov-2024
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
19-Oct-2024
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
18-Sep-2024
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
17-Aug-2024
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
10-Jul-2024
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
19-Jun-2024
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
20-Apr-2024
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
13-Mar-2024
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
17-Feb-2024
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
17-Jan-2024
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
16-Dec-2023
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
20-Sep-2023
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
19-Aug-2023
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
28-Jul-2023
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
07-Jul-2023
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
28-Jun-2023
Appearence
Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
-
20-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 24/2023
Case Summary: 24/2023 Court: Sukul Ram Junior Judge Court, Narkatiaganj Petitioner: Basdeo Mahto | Respondent: Surasati Devi and Others Order Date: 29.05.2026 Outcome: The court accepted the petitioner's application for modification of court fees from ₹1,000 to ₹1,000 (maintaining the fee at ₹1,000) under Order 6, Rule 18 and Section 151 of the CPC. The petitioner was permitted to amend the plaint within the statutory time limit. The case was adjourned to 19.06.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts