JAYADA KHATOON vs SHEKH TAIYAB AND OTHER Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA — 73/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRWC220000992023
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
99/2023
Filing Date
17-04-2023
Registration No
73/2023
Registration Date
17-04-2023
Court
Narkatiaganj Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYADA KHATOON
Adv. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA
Respondent(s)
SHEKH TAIYAB AND OTHER Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
SHEKH WAKIL
Adv. VIKASH KUMAR CHAUBEY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc |
| 12-03-2026 | Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc |
| 02-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 22-12-2025 | HEARING |
| 29-10-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Civil Suit No. 73/2023 Court: Court of Additional District Judge-1, Narkatiyaganj Parties: Jayada Khatoon (Petitioner) v. Shekh Taiyab & Others (Respondents) Date of Order: 12.03.2026 Outcome: The court dismissed the petitioner's applications dated 05.06.2025 and 12.03.2026 as not maintainable. The court rejected the defendant's written statement filed on 03.04.2025 as time-barred and improperly accepted by the trial court, holding that no valid reasons were recorded to justify the extension beyond the 90-day statutory limit under Order 8, Rule 1 of the CPC. The case is scheduled for hearing on 28.04.2026 under Section 89 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Civil Suit No. 73/2023 Court: Court of Additional District Judge-1, Narkatiyaganj Parties: Jayada Khatoon (Petitioner) v. Shekh Taiyab & Others (Respondents) Date of Order: 12.03.2026 Outcome: The court dismissed the petitioner's applications dated 05.06.2025 and 12.03.2026 as not maintainable. The court rejected the defendant's written statement filed on 03.04.2025 as time-barred and improperly accepted by the trial court, holding that no valid reasons were recorded to justify the extension beyond the 90-day statutory limit under Order 8, Rule 1 of the CPC. The case is scheduled for hearing on 28.04.2026 under Section 89 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts