LALBABU PRASAD vs RAMJI HALWAI AND OTHERS Advocate - ANIL KUMAR MISHRA — 50/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Title Suit

CNR: BRWC220000922017

Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

50/2017

Filing Date

04-03-2023

Registration No

50/2017

Registration Date

04-03-2023

Court

Narkatiaganj Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 09

Petitioner(s)

LALBABU PRASAD

Adv. K.D. THAKUR

Respondent(s)

RAMJI HALWAI AND OTHERS Advocate - ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

DHIRAJ HALWAI

Adv. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

SHIV HALWAI

Adv. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

KRISHNA HALWAI

Adv. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

RAKESH HALWAI

Adv. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

PRADIP HALWAI

Adv. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

AJAY HALWAI

Adv. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

SANJAY HALWAI

Adv. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

RANJAY HALWAI

Adv. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA

MALIK THAKUR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

16-04-2026

Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

24-03-2026

Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

10-03-2026

ORDER

18-02-2026

HEARING

10-02-2026

HEARING

Interim Orders

04-06-2025
IA Order
19-08-2025
IA Order
20-11-2025
IA Order
24-03-2026
IA Order

Summary: The court rejected defendants 01-09's application dated 07-01-2026 filed under Sections 60 and 64 of the Indian Evidence Act, 2023, declaring it premature. The court found the application not maintainable because the plaintiff had not yet been examined as a witness and the defendants' objections should be raised during cross-examination. The case is adjourned to 16-04-2026 for the plaintiff's examination-in-chief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected defendants 01-09's application dated 07-01-2026 filed under Sections 60 and 64 of the Indian Evidence Act, 2023, declaring it premature. The court found the application not maintainable because the plaintiff had not yet been examined as a witness and the defendants' objections should be raised during cross-examination. The case is adjourned to 16-04-2026 for the plaintiff's examination-in-chief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Narkatiaganj Civil Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case