PHOOL MATI DEVI vs RAMA SHANKAR BARAIYEE AND OTHERS Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR — 16/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: W.S. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
Partion Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT
CNR: BRWC220000542020
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
54/2020
Filing Date
12-03-2020
Registration No
16/2020
Registration Date
12-03-2020
Court
Narkatiaganj Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PHOOL MATI DEVI
Adv. RAJEEV KUMAR VARMA, BIRENDRA OJHA
Respondent(s)
RAMA SHANKAR BARAIYEE AND OTHERS Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR
RAMJEET BARAIYE
HEERAMATO DEVI
Adv. SUDHIR KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M
W.S
W.S
W.S
W.S
W.S
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | W.S |
| 12-03-2026 | W.S |
| 22-01-2026 | W.S |
| 07-11-2025 | W.S |
| 17-09-2025 | W.S |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 16/2020 - Phool Mati Devi v. Rama Shankar Baraiyee and Others Outcome: The court allowed the petitioner's application dated 16.02.2023 and accepted the applicants as necessary parties/respondents in this partition suit. The applicants were directed to be added as defendants in the respondent column. The case was adjourned to 13.05.2024 for further proceedings. Key Finding: The court found that the applicants had a legitimate interest in the disputed land as they were descendants of Dukhi Baraiyee (as per genealogical records from the village sarpanch), and therefore were necessary parties to the partition proceedings concerning jointly-held ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 16/2020 - Phool Mati Devi v. Rama Shankar Baraiyee and Others Outcome: The court allowed the petitioner's application dated 16.02.2023 and accepted the applicants as necessary parties/respondents in this partition suit. The applicants were directed to be added as defendants in the respondent column. The case was adjourned to 13.05.2024 for further proceedings. Key Finding: The court found that the applicants had a legitimate interest in the disputed land as they were descendants of Dukhi Baraiyee (as per genealogical records from the village sarpanch), and therefore were necessary parties to the partition proceedings concerning jointly-held ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts