PHOOL MATI DEVI vs RAMA SHANKAR BARAIYEE AND OTHERS Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR — 16/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: W.S. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

W.S Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Partion Suit - TITLE PARTITION SUIT

CNR: BRWC220000542020

Filing Number

54/2020

Filing Date

12-Mar-2020

Registration No

16/2020

Registration Date

12-Mar-2020

Court

Narkatiaganj Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PHOOL MATI DEVI

    Adv. RAJEEV KUMAR VARMA, BIRENDRA OJHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMA SHANKAR BARAIYEE AND OTHERS Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR

  2. 2.RAMJEET BARAIYE

  3. 3.HEERAMATO DEVI

    Adv. SUDHIR KUMAR

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-May-2026

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  5. 07-Nov-2025

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  6. 17-Sep-2025

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  7. 25-Jun-2025

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  8. 07-May-2025

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  9. 12-Mar-2025

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  10. 05-Feb-2025

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  11. 11-Dec-2024

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  12. 23-Oct-2024

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  13. 04-Sep-2024

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  14. 31-Jul-2024

    W.S

    Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

  15. 12-Jun-2024

    W.S

    Sub -Judge- II-Cum A.C.J.M

  16. 13-May-2024

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  17. 03-Apr-2024

    IA OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 16/2020 - Phool Mati Devi v. Rama Shankar Baraiyee and Others Outcome: The court allowed the petitioner's application dated 16.02.2023 and accepted the applicants as necessary parties/respondents in this partition suit. The applicants were directed to be added as defendants in the respondent column. The case was adjourned to 13.05.2024 for further proceedings. Key Finding: The court found that the applicants had a legitimate interest in the disputed land as they were descendants of Dukhi Baraiyee (as per genealogical records from the village sarpanch), and therefore were necessary parties to the partition proceedings concerning jointly-held ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 03-Apr-2024

    W.S

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  19. 20-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  20. 28-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  21. 01-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  22. 20-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  23. 18-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  24. 20-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  25. 16-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  26. 12-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  27. 07-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  28. 03-May-2023

    Hearing

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  29. 29-Mar-2023

    Rejoinder

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  30. 15-Mar-2023

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  31. 15-Feb-2023

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  32. 11-Jan-2023

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  33. 23-Nov-2022

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  34. 19-Oct-2022

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  35. 14-Sep-2022

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  36. 17-Aug-2022

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  37. 20-Jul-2022

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  38. 22-Jun-2022

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  39. 08-Jun-2022

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  40. 18-May-2022

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  41. 20-Apr-2022

    Issues

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  42. 06-Apr-2022

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  43. 16-Mar-2022

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  44. 09-Feb-2022

    IA OrderView PDF

  45. 09-Feb-2022

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  46. 05-Jan-2022

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  47. 09-Dec-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  48. 18-Nov-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  49. 08-Oct-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  50. 13-Sep-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  51. 21-Aug-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  52. 20-Aug-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  53. 28-Jul-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  54. 06-Jul-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  55. 15-Jun-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  56. 22-May-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  57. 28-Apr-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  58. 31-Mar-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  59. 24-Feb-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  60. 21-Jan-2021

    IA OrderView PDF

  61. 21-Jan-2021

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  62. 18-Dec-2020

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-III-Cum A.C.J.M

  63. 11-Nov-2020

    Appearence

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  64. 14-Oct-2020

    For Removal Of Defect

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  65. 21-Sep-2020

    For Removal Of Defect

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  66. 09-Sep-2020

    For Removal Of Defect

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  67. 02-Sep-2020

    For Removal Of Defect

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  68. 29-Jul-2020

    For Removal Of Defect

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  69. 01-Jul-2020

    For Removal Of Defect

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  70. 06-Jun-2020

    For Removal Of Defect

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  71. 14-May-2020

    For Removal Of Defect

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  72. 22-Apr-2020

    For Removal Of Defect

    Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

  73. 25-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  74. 12-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 16/2020 - Phool Mati Devi v. Rama Shankar Baraiyee and Others Outcome: The court allowed the petitioner's application dated 16.02.2023 and accepted the applicants as necessary parties/respondents in this partition suit. The applicants were directed to be added as defendants in the respondent column. The case was adjourned to 13.05.2024 for further proceedings. Key Finding: The court found that the applicants had a legitimate interest in the disputed land as they were descendants of Dukhi Baraiyee (as per genealogical records from the village sarpanch), and therefore were necessary parties to the partition proceedings concerning jointly-held ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case