PRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHER vs RASHAMI PATHAK AND OTHER Advocate - NANDAN CHAUDHARY — 38/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Title Suit

CNR: BRWC220000522023

Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

Next Hearing

30th June 2026

Filing Number

52/2023

Filing Date

10-03-2023

Registration No

38/2023

Registration Date

10-03-2023

Court

Narkatiaganj Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 09

Petitioner(s)

PRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHER

Adv. AJAY KUMAR CHAUBEY

JYOTI DEVI

Adv. AJIT KUMAR CHAUBEY

Respondent(s)

RASHAMI PATHAK AND OTHER Advocate - NANDAN CHAUDHARY

ANUJ KUMAR PATHAK

Adv. NANDAN CHAUDHARY

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

26-05-2026

Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

28-04-2026

Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

12-03-2026

Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

09-02-2026

Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

02-01-2026

Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

Interim Orders

17-07-2025
IA Order

Summary of Case 38/2023 Court: District Court, Suklal Ram, Additional District Judge-1, Narkatiaganj Order Date: 17.07.2025 The court allowed the petitioner's application to amend the plaint. The petitioners had filed an amendment application dated 06.02.2025 under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, requesting correction of a typographical error in paragraph 02 of the plaint where "09 Katta 10 Dhur" land was incorrectly typed as "05 Katta 05 Dhur." The court granted permission to correct this to the proper land description. The amendment was deemed purely formal with no adverse impact on the case nature or respondents' interests. The case was adjourned to 19.08.2025 for hearing and submission of the amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 38/2023 Court: District Court, Suklal Ram, Additional District Judge-1, Narkatiaganj Order Date: 17.07.2025 The court allowed the petitioner's application to amend the plaint. The petitioners had filed an amendment application dated 06.02.2025 under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, requesting correction of a typographical error in paragraph 02 of the plaint where "09 Katta 10 Dhur" land was incorrectly typed as "05 Katta 05 Dhur." The court granted permission to correct this to the proper land description. The amendment was deemed purely formal with no adverse impact on the case nature or respondents' interests. The case was adjourned to 19.08.2025 for hearing and submission of the amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Narkatiaganj Civil Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case