BRIJKISHOR GIRI @ KHELAWAN GIRI vs ANIL GIRI AND OTHERS Advocate - SHEO NARAIN PRASAD, BHUWANESHWAR MISHRA, BHUWANESHWAR MISHRAANUP KUMAR DUBEY, — 8/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Title Suit

CNR: BRWC220000132021

HEARING

Next Hearing

21st July 2026

Filing Number

13/2021

Filing Date

07-01-2021

Registration No

8/2021

Registration Date

07-01-2021

Court

Narkatiaganj Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

BRIJKISHOR GIRI @ KHELAWAN GIRI

Adv. GAURI SHANKAR SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

ANIL GIRI AND OTHERS Advocate - SHEO NARAIN PRASAD, BHUWANESHWAR MISHRA, BHUWANESHWAR MISHRAANUP KUMAR DUBEY,

SANTOSH GIRI

Adv. SHEO NARAIN PRASAD

ANU DEVI

Adv. SHEO NARAIN PRASAD

ARTI DEVI

Adv. SHEO NARAIN PRASAD

RAKESH GIRI

Adv. SHEO NARAIN PRASAD

MUKESH GIRI

Adv. SHEO NARAIN PRASAD

TUNU GIRI

Adv. MANISH KUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub-Judge-I-Cum A.C.J.M

19-05-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

W.S

12-02-2026

W.S

11-12-2025

W.S

29-10-2025

W.S

Interim Orders

23-12-2021
IA Order

Case Summary: 8/2021 - Brijkishor Giri v. Anil Giri Outcome: The court found that registered notice served on Respondents 1 (Anil Giri) and 5 (Rakesh Giri) was sufficient, treating service as complete. However, service on Respondents 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 (Santosh Giri, Anu Devi, Arti Devi, Mukesh Giri, and Tunu Giri) was found insufficient. The petitioner was directed to pursue registered notice service on the remaining respondents within one week. Case adjourned to 07.02.2022 for respondents' appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 8/2021 - Brijkishor Giri v. Anil Giri Outcome: The court found that registered notice served on Respondents 1 (Anil Giri) and 5 (Rakesh Giri) was sufficient, treating service as complete. However, service on Respondents 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 (Santosh Giri, Anu Devi, Arti Devi, Mukesh Giri, and Tunu Giri) was found insufficient. The petitioner was directed to pursue registered notice service on the remaining respondents within one week. Case adjourned to 07.02.2022 for respondents' appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Narkatiaganj Civil Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case