Harendra Rai vs Prem Ram Advocate - sri — 224/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366A. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

SESSIONS CASE

CNR: BRWC100129332022

Filing Number

12933/2022

Filing Date

27-Sep-2022

Registration No

224/2022

Registration Date

27-Sep-2022

Court

Bagha Sub Div. Court

Judge

2-Ist Additional District and Session Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

Bagaha Mahila Station

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 363,366A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Harendra Rai

    Adv. APP for state

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prem Ram Advocate - sri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Bagha, West Champaran acquitted accused Prem Ram on March 25, 2026 of charges under IPC Sections 363 (kidnapping), 366 (abduction) and 34 (criminal conspiracy) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had kidnapped the complainant's 13-year-old daughter on September 18, 2018, as the victim herself denied the abduction in her statement and the court found contradictions in prosecution witnesses' testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  7. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  8. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  9. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  10. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  11. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  12. 09-May-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  13. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  14. 05-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  15. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  16. 28-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  17. 04-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  18. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  19. 28-May-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  20. 28-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  21. 29-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  22. 23-Nov-2023

    Evidence

  23. 12-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  24. 13-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  25. 20-May-2023

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  26. 22-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  27. 30-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  28. 02-Dec-2022

    Appearence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  29. 30-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 27-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 224/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Bagha, West Champaran acquitted accused Prem Ram on March 25, 2026 of charges under IPC Sections 363 (kidnapping), 366 (abduction) and 34 (criminal conspiracy) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had kidnapped the complainant's 13-year-old daughter on September 18, 2018, as the victim herself denied the abduction in her statement and the court found contradictions in prosecution witnesses' testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case