satyendra Kumar vs Amarendra Kumar Jaiswal and 3 others Advocate - Sri — 182/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304B,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

SESSIONS CASE

CNR: BRWC100118702022

Filing Number

11870/2022

Filing Date

17-Aug-2022

Registration No

182/2022

Registration Date

17-Aug-2022

Court

Bagha Sub Div. Court

Judge

2-Ist Additional District and Session Judge

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

544

Police Station

PATHKHAULI CAMP POLICE STATION

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 304B,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.satyendra Kumar

    Adv. APP for state

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amarendra Kumar Jaiswal and 3 others Advocate - Sri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 182/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused—Amarendra Kumar Jaiswal, Jitendra Kumar Jaiswal, Gudiya Devi, and Bhagwati Devi—of charges under IPC Sections 304B (death by negligence), 302 (murder), and 34 (common intention). The prosecution failed to prove the allegations against the accused with credible evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The case involved a dowry death allegation where the victim (Jyoti Devi) allegedly died due to harassment by her husband and in-laws over dowry demands. However, prosecution witnesses testified that the victim suffered from severe anemia and blood deficiency requiring extended medical treatment in Gorakhpur and Bettiah, ultimately dying during treatment. No witness testimony directly implicated the accused in causing her death, and the prosecution failed to present medical experts or investigators to substantiate dowry harassment charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  9. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  10. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  11. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  12. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  13. 09-May-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  14. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  15. 05-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  16. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  17. 28-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  18. 04-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  19. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  20. 28-May-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  21. 28-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  22. 29-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  23. 20-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  24. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence

  25. 30-Oct-2023

    Evidence

  26. 23-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  27. 26-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  28. 04-May-2023

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  29. 03-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  30. 10-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  31. 22-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  32. 14-Oct-2022

    Charge

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  33. 20-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 17-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 182/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 182/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused—Amarendra Kumar Jaiswal, Jitendra Kumar Jaiswal, Gudiya Devi, and Bhagwati Devi—of charges under IPC Sections 304B (death by negligence), 302 (murder), and 34 (common intention). The prosecution failed to prove the allegations against the accused with credible evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The case involved a dowry death allegation where the victim (Jyoti Devi) allegedly died due to harassment by her husband and in-laws over dowry demands. However, prosecution witnesses testified that the victim suffered from severe anemia and blood deficiency requiring extended medical treatment in Gorakhpur and Bettiah, ultimately dying during treatment. No witness testimony directly implicated the accused in causing her death, and the prosecution failed to present medical experts or investigators to substantiate dowry harassment charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case