Yogendra Paswan vs Bechu Yadav, Haroon Mian, Bhagirathi Chaudhary, Ranglal Yadav — 278/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,307/34. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 15th April 2026.
SESSIONS CASE
CNR: BRWC100051482025
Filing Number
4766/2025
Filing Date
22-08-2025
Registration No
278/2025
Registration Date
22-08-2025
Court
Bagha Sub Div. Court
Judge
2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
71
Police Station
bagaha
Year
1999
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yogendra Paswan
Adv. PRABHU PRASAD
Respondent(s)
Bechu Yadav, Haroon Mian, Bhagirathi Chaudhary, Ranglal Yadav
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist
Disposed
Order / Judgement
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Order / Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court acquitted all three accused—Bechu Yadav, Mo. Haroon, and Bhagirathi Chaudhary—under Section 232 CrPC on April 15, 2026. The prosecution failed to present credible evidence to prove the charges of theft (IPC Section 379), criminal intimidation (Section 307), and violations of the Arms Act. The court found that the six prosecution witnesses presented no substantive testimony regarding the incident and were declared hostile, rendering the case against the accused insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court acquitted all three accused—Bechu Yadav, Mo. Haroon, and Bhagirathi Chaudhary—under Section 232 CrPC on April 15, 2026. The prosecution failed to present credible evidence to prove the charges of theft (IPC Section 379), criminal intimidation (Section 307), and violations of the Arms Act. The court found that the six prosecution witnesses presented no substantive testimony regarding the incident and were declared hostile, rendering the case against the accused insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts