Shriram Kushwaha vs Alauddin Dhobi Advocate - sri — 172/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366A,120B,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
SESSIONS CASE
CNR: BRWC100031982023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3195/2023
Filing Date
31-05-2023
Registration No
172/2023
Registration Date
31-05-2023
Court
Bagha Sub Div. Court
Judge
2-Ist Additional District and Session Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
Thakrahan
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shriram Kushwaha
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Alauddin Dhobi Advocate - sri
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Ist Additional District and Session Judge
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 24-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 16-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Bagha, West Champaran acquitted the accused Alauddin Dhobi of charges under IPC Sections 363 (kidnapping), 366 (abduction), 120B (criminal conspiracy), and 34 (common intention) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as three out of four prosecution witnesses denied knowledge of the alleged incident, and the victim (the complainant's daughter) testified that she willingly eloped to marry the accused rather than being abducted. The court found no credible evidence to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Bagha, West Champaran acquitted the accused Alauddin Dhobi of charges under IPC Sections 363 (kidnapping), 366 (abduction), 120B (criminal conspiracy), and 34 (common intention) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as three out of four prosecution witnesses denied knowledge of the alleged incident, and the victim (the complainant's daughter) testified that she willingly eloped to marry the accused rather than being abducted. The court found no credible evidence to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts