Shriram Kushwaha vs Alauddin Dhobi Advocate - sri — 172/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366A,120B,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

SESSIONS CASE

CNR: BRWC100031982023

Filing Number

3195/2023

Filing Date

31-May-2023

Registration No

172/2023

Registration Date

31-May-2023

Court

Bagha Sub Div. Court

Judge

2-Ist Additional District and Session Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

Thakrahan

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 363,366A,120B,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shriram Kushwaha

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Alauddin Dhobi Advocate - sri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Bagha, West Champaran acquitted the accused Alauddin Dhobi of charges under IPC Sections 363 (kidnapping), 366 (abduction), 120B (criminal conspiracy), and 34 (common intention) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as three out of four prosecution witnesses denied knowledge of the alleged incident, and the victim (the complainant's daughter) testified that she willingly eloped to marry the accused rather than being abducted. The court found no credible evidence to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  11. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  12. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  13. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  14. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  15. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  16. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  17. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  18. 05-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  19. 08-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  20. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  21. 06-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  22. 15-May-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  23. 15-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  24. 16-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  25. 10-Jan-2024

    Hearing Before Charge

  26. 08-Nov-2023

    Hearing Before Charge

  27. 03-Oct-2023

    Hearing Before Charge

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  28. 24-Aug-2023

    Hearing Before Charge

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  29. 09-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 31-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 172/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Bagha, West Champaran acquitted the accused Alauddin Dhobi of charges under IPC Sections 363 (kidnapping), 366 (abduction), 120B (criminal conspiracy), and 34 (common intention) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as three out of four prosecution witnesses denied knowledge of the alleged incident, and the victim (the complainant's daughter) testified that she willingly eloped to marry the accused rather than being abducted. The court found no credible evidence to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case