Anil yadav, virendra yadav, pratima devi and rita devi vs state of bihar — 204/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),126(2),115(2),109(1),118(1),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRWC100029182026
Filing Number
2781/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
204/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
Bagha Sub Div. Court
Judge
2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
86
Police Station
Dhanaha
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anil yadav, virendra yadav, pratima devi and rita devi
Adv. SHRI ADITYA KUMAR GIRI
Respondent(s)
-
1.state of bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court partially granted the anticipatory bail petition. Virendra Yadav's bail was rejected due to specific allegations of assaulting the informant with a spade, causing a grievous head injury (frontal bone fracture). However, Anil Yadav, Pratima Devi, and Rita Devi were granted anticipatory bail with Rs. 10,000 bond and two sureties each, as there were only general allegations against them with no specific assault charges, and the dispute arose from a land disagreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Additional Sessions Judge Ist
-
02-Apr-2026
Order
District Additional Sessions Judge Ist
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Ist Additional District and Session Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 204/2026
The court partially granted the anticipatory bail petition. Virendra Yadav's bail was rejected due to specific allegations of assaulting the informant with a spade, causing a grievous head injury (frontal bone fracture). However, Anil Yadav, Pratima Devi, and Rita Devi were granted anticipatory bail with Rs. 10,000 bond and two sureties each, as there were only general allegations against them with no specific assault charges, and the dispute arose from a land disagreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts