Anawar khan alias muna vs state of bihar — 198/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2)85,89,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRWC100028922026
Filing Number
2755/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
198/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
Bagha Sub Div. Court
Judge
27-III rd Additional District and Sessions Court
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
965
Police Station
Bagaha Complaint Case
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anawar khan alias muna
Adv. SHRI SHAILESH KUMAR TIWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.state of bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Bail
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Anawar Khan alias Munna, who was accused of assault, dowry-related offenses, and causing miscarriage to his wife. The court found specific allegations of assault and torture against the petitioner supported by witness testimonies and photographic evidence of injuries, determining that the charges were not bailable under sections 85 and 89 of BNS, and therefore declined to grant him anticipatory bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
III rd Additional District and Sessions Court
-
13-Apr-2026
Hearing
III rd Additional District and Sessions Court
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
III rd Additional District and Sessions Court
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 198/2026
The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Anawar Khan alias Munna, who was accused of assault, dowry-related offenses, and causing miscarriage to his wife. The court found specific allegations of assault and torture against the petitioner supported by witness testimonies and photographic evidence of injuries, determining that the charges were not bailable under sections 85 and 89 of BNS, and therefore declined to grant him anticipatory bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts