Vikash yadav alias Nanhe yadav and four others vs state of bihar — 185/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,190,191(2),191(3),115(2),303(2),126(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRWC100028652026

Filing Number

2728/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

185/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

Bagha Sub Div. Court

Judge

2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

72

Police Station

Chautarawa

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,190,191(2),191(3),115(2),303(2),126(2),352,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vikash yadav alias Nanhe yadav and four others

    Adv. RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY

  2. 2.Dipu yadav alias bipin yadav

  3. 3.radheshyam dubey

  4. 4.madhaw dubey

  5. 5.lal babu yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state of bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 185/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners accused of assault and related offenses arising from a land dispute. The court found that while injuries were alleged, all injuries were simple ones caused by blunt objects, with no sharp cut injuries found despite allegations of assault by a sharp weapon. The court noted the underlying land dispute between parties and determined the injuries did not warrant denial of bail. The petitioners were directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount within one month, subject to standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 185/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 185/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners accused of assault and related offenses arising from a land dispute. The court found that while injuries were alleged, all injuries were simple ones caused by blunt objects, with no sharp cut injuries found despite allegations of assault by a sharp weapon. The court noted the underlying land dispute between parties and determined the injuries did not warrant denial of bail. The petitioners were directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount within one month, subject to standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case