Inar Majhi alias Indra Majhi and eleven others vs state of bihar — 179/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),303(2),352,351(2),109(1),118(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRWC100028552026

Filing Number

2718/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

179/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

Bagha Sub Div. Court

Judge

2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

74

Police Station

Ramnagar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),303(2),352,351(2),109(1),118(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inar Majhi alias Indra Majhi and eleven others

    Adv. SHRI UPADHYAY SUNIL KUMAR

  2. 2.Bhbhichan majhi alias bhbhichan paswan

  3. 3.renuka kumari

  4. 4.Bigri devi alias bigna devi

  5. 5.Bigri devi alias bigna devi

  6. 6.vishvaranjan paswan

  7. 7.sima devi

  8. 8.Megha Paswan alias Mahesh paswan

  9. 9.Prabhawati devi

  10. 10.sudama paswan

  11. 11.moli kumari alias gita kumari

  12. 12.praduman paswan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state of bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 179/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for two petitioners (Bhabhichhan Manjhi and Praduman Paswan) who faced direct assault allegations causing injuries to the informant's husband and daughter respectively during a land dispute confrontation. However, bail was granted to ten other petitioners (Inar Majhi, Renuka Kumari, Nisha Kumari, Bigri Devi, Vishvaranjan Paswan, Sima Devi, Megha Paswan, Prabhawati Devi, Sudama Paswan, and Moli Kumari) on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, as allegations against them were general and omnibus with no specific assault charges, and they had no criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 179/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 179/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for two petitioners (Bhabhichhan Manjhi and Praduman Paswan) who faced direct assault allegations causing injuries to the informant's husband and daughter respectively during a land dispute confrontation. However, bail was granted to ten other petitioners (Inar Majhi, Renuka Kumari, Nisha Kumari, Bigri Devi, Vishvaranjan Paswan, Sima Devi, Megha Paswan, Prabhawati Devi, Sudama Paswan, and Moli Kumari) on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, as allegations against them were general and omnibus with no specific assault charges, and they had no criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case