Jiut yadav and Satrudhan yadav alias satarunand yadav vs state of bihar — 174/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),109(1),191(2),190,352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRWC100027932026

Filing Number

2662/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

174/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Bagha Sub Div. Court

Judge

2-District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

151

Police Station

Naurangiya

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),109(1),191(2),190,352,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jiut yadav and Satrudhan yadav alias satarunand yadav

    Adv. SRI MANINDRA MOHAN TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state of bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District & Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Jiut Yadav and Satrudhan Yadav in a case involving alleged assault on the informant and her family members on 30.12.2025. The court found that allegations against the petitioners were general and non-specific, most offences were bailable, and the dispute arose from a land-related conflict between parties with counter-cases. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District Additional Sessions Judge Ist

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 174/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Jiut Yadav and Satrudhan Yadav in a case involving alleged assault on the informant and her family members on 30.12.2025. The court found that allegations against the petitioners were general and non-specific, most offences were bailable, and the dispute arose from a land-related conflict between parties with counter-cases. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case