Vikash Ram, Nibha Devi, Seema Devi and 7 Others vs State of BIhar — 170/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),351(2),117(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRWC100027502026

Filing Number

2622/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

170/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Bagha Sub Div. Court

Judge

2-Ist Additional District and Session Judge

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

75

Police Station

bagaha

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),351(2),117(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vikash Ram, Nibha Devi, Seema Devi and 7 Others

    Adv. SHRI SUNIL KUMAR MISHRA

  2. 2.Madhu devi

  3. 3.Ram lal ram

  4. 4.Umesh ram

  5. 5.Dinesh ram

  6. 6.Dinesh ram

  7. 7.Anita devi

  8. 8.Vidhayachal ram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of BIhar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Anticipatory Bail Petition No. 170/2026 The court partially granted anticipatory bail to eight of ten petitioners accused of assault and criminal intimidation in a land dispute. The court rejected bail for Dinesh Ram and Nanhu Ram due to specific allegations of assault with a Khanti weapon causing injuries, including a grievous fracture. The remaining eight petitioners were granted bail (Rs. 10,000 with sureties) as no direct assault allegations existed against them, though the court noted the underlying land dispute between related parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Ist Additional District and Session Judge

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 170/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Anticipatory Bail Petition No. 170/2026 The court partially granted anticipatory bail to eight of ten petitioners accused of assault and criminal intimidation in a land dispute. The court rejected bail for Dinesh Ram and Nanhu Ram due to specific allegations of assault with a Khanti weapon causing injuries, including a grievous fracture. The remaining eight petitioners were granted bail (Rs. 10,000 with sureties) as no direct assault allegations existed against them, though the court noted the underlying land dispute between related parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case